Adrienne Wilkerson

See Our Blogs

Explore insights on SEO, AI, and digital marketing strategies designed to help your business grow, stay visible, and adapt in a constantly evolving online landscape.

Get Started
Call For Consultation
Beacon_Icon_resouse

Somebody Made a Decision About Your Clients’ Privacy Years Ago. There’s a Good Chance it Wasn’t You.

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

The tracking code on a behavioral health practice’s website is a legal decision because it controls what information about people seeking care leaves the practice and who receives it. Regulators and plaintiffs’ attorneys have increasingly treated that flow as the practice’s responsibility, even when someone else installed the code. Leaving a default in place is still a choice, and the owner is the one who carries it.

I know how most owners hear that. The Meta pixel and the Google tag feel like marketing settings, something a web developer or an agency switched on years ago so the ads would work. Nobody sat in a meeting and voted to send appointment data to Facebook.

That’s exactly the problem. Nobody decided. It happened by default, and a default is still a decision.

It comes down to what tracking code can see on a behavioral health website. A tag installed to measure ads also reports which pages a visitor viewed, what they clicked, and identifiers tied to their device. On a site about anxiety treatment or substance use care, that combination can describe a person looking for help.

Here’s how it usually happens. A practice launches a website, and the developer adds Google Analytics because every site has it. An agency comes in to run ads and adds the Meta pixel, because that’s how the platform measures results, and the ad platform’s own setup screens walk you right into it. Years go by. Two vendors later, nobody remembers who put what where.

It’s like a pothole on the road out of town. You hit it once, then you start steering around it without thinking, and after a while you don’t see it at all. It takes someone driving that road for the first time to say, “Whoa, what is that?”

This is common, and it’s been common for a long time. A study published in PNAS Nexus in December 2025 followed 1,201 U.S. hospitals from 2012 through 2023 and found that 66 percent of the sample used pixel tracking. The same researchers linked pixel use to a higher chance of a data breach, a 46 percent relative increase.

Those are hospitals with legal departments and compliance officers. If it happened to them, it can happen to a 20-person group practice that has neither.

“If your website sends patient data to an ad platform, odds are nobody at your practice decided it should. It happened by default, and a default is still a decision the owner carries.”

What does a tracking pixel actually send from a behavioral health website?

More than most owners would guess: the address of each page a visitor views, the buttons they click, activity on forms, and identifiers like IP address and browser cookies that connect one visit to the next. A page address like /eating-disorder-treatment/ tells the receiving platform what the visitor was reading about, and a submitted form can tie that to a name.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services spelled this out in its guidance on online tracking. The HHS Office for Civil Rights bulletin states that “tracking technologies on a regulated entity’s user-authenticated webpages generally have access to PHI,” meaning protected health information. That covers patient portals, logged-in scheduling, and anything else behind a password.

Public pages are a more contested question, and I want to be straight with you about that. In June 2024, a federal court in Texas vacated part of that HHS guidance, the part treating an IP address plus a visit to a public page about a health condition as enough on its own to trigger HIPAA. HHS notes the ruling on the bulletin itself. The rest of the guidance is still posted, and the ruling didn’t address the FTC or state privacy laws.

So here’s the honest version. Some of this is settled, some of it is being argued in court, and none of it is a green light. We go deeper on the specifics in Is the Meta Pixel HIPAA Compliant? and Why Is Website Tracking a HIPAA Risk for Behavioral Health Practices?

Two groups every practice owner should pay attention to: federal regulators and plaintiffs’ attorneys. HHS and the Federal Trade Commission have warned providers directly, the FTC has taken action against mental health companies over sharing data with advertising platforms, and class actions over tracking technology have ended in multimillion-dollar settlements.

In July 2023, the FTC and HHS sent a joint letter to roughly 130 hospital systems and telehealth providers warning them about tools like the Meta pixel and Google Analytics. Melanie Fontes Rainer, then Director of the HHS Office for Civil Rights, said in the announcement: “Although online tracking technologies can be used for beneficial purposes, patients and others should not have to sacrifice the privacy of their health information when using a hospital’s website.”

The FTC has also acted on companies in our corner of the world. In March 2023, it announced that BetterHelp would pay $7.8 million to settle FTC charges that it revealed consumers’ email addresses, IP addresses, and health questionnaire information to platforms including Facebook for advertising purposes. In April 2024, it announced a proposed order against Cerebral, charging that the company provided sensitive information of nearly 3.2 million consumers to third parties through tracking tools on its website and apps.

Then there are the private lawsuits. As reported, Advocate Aurora Health’s $12.225 million settlement in a pixel tracking case received final approval in 2024, and Novant Health settled a patient class action for $6.66 million that same year. Sutter Health’s $21.5 million settlement over alleged disclosures of patient information to third parties received final court approval in March 2026, according to the court-approved settlement notice.

You might be reading this thinking it’s a hospital problem. I’d push back on that. The tracking code works exactly the same way on a 15-clinician practice’s website. The only difference is who has a general counsel on speed dial.

“The tracking code on a 15-clinician practice’s website works exactly the way it works on a hospital’s. The difference is the hospital has a general counsel to call.”

Who is responsible for website tracking if an agency installed it?

You are. Even when an agency or developer installed the tracking, the responsibility sits with the practice. If the practice is a HIPAA covered entity, as practices that bill insurance electronically are, the obligation to protect patient information stays with the practice. Vendors that handle that information take on duties of their own as business associates, and those duties sit alongside the practice’s.

HHS is direct about this. Its bulletin says a tracking vendor “is a business associate if it meets the definition of a business associate, regardless of whether the required BAA is in place.” Skipping the agreement leaves the relationship in place and the protections out.

I’ll be the first to admit this one is uncomfortable to write, because agencies like ours are the ones in that sentence. Agencies install tags. It’s part of the job. That’s exactly why we think an owner should know what’s on the site, in writing, and why we’d rather you ask us hard questions than assume we’ve got it handled.

We break down who carries which responsibility in Who Is Responsible if a Practice Website Leaks Patient Data?, and the basics of the paperwork in What Is a Business Associate Agreement and When Do You Need One?

How does website tracking connect to what ad platforms learn from your leads?

Tracking and lead quality both decide what an ad platform learns, which is why this month picks up right where September left off. In September I wrote about why your ads keep finding the wrong people when they learn from every form fill. The obvious next question from any owner is whether sending a better signal back creates a HIPAA problem. That depends entirely on what gets sent.

The line we hold at Beacon is simple. Your ads can learn from what you count. What you count should never carry a person’s name, how to reach them, or what they came looking for.

In practice, that comes down to three rules:

  • Tracking stays off booking, intake, and patient portal pages. Those are the pages where a visitor is acting as a patient or a prospective patient.
  • No names, email addresses, phone numbers, conditions, page addresses, or form content go to an ad platform. None of it, in any form.
  • What the platform receives is a generic event. Something like “an appointment request happened.” The only other thing that travels with it is the visitor’s IP address, and it’s hashed before it leaves.

Hashing scrambles a piece of data into a string of characters before it leaves your site. It’s a real protection, and it’s one layer. The FTC’s own technology staff wrote in July 2024 that hashing on its own “still creates a unique signature that can track a person or device over time.” That’s why the bigger protection is everything that never gets sent at all. A hash should never be the reason someone feels comfortable sending a name or an email address.

Stephanie’s piece this Thursday walks through how server-side conversion tracking handles this, and why pulling the pixel out entirely creates a different problem.

What should a practice owner do about website tracking this week?

Start with one request to whoever manages your website: a written list of every tag on it, what each one sends, and which pages it fires on. That list answers most of the questions that matter, and it puts the decision back where it belongs, with the owner.

Here’s what I’d ask, in writing:

  1. What tags are on our site right now, and who added each one? Every pixel, every analytics script, every chat widget.
  2. What does each one send, and to whom? Page addresses, form activity, identifiers. Ask for specifics.
  3. Do any of them fire on booking, intake, or portal pages? If yes, ask to have them removed.
  4. What exactly reaches an ad platform from our site, and what gets hashed or stripped out before it goes?
  5. Which of our vendors have signed business associate agreements? And which ones touch patient information without one?

You don’t need to understand the code to ask those questions. You need someone who can answer them plainly. If nobody can, that tells you something too.

One caution. Don’t rip everything out in a panic. Pull every tracking tag and you lose the ability to see which marketing is working, and you’re right back to guessing which marketing filled your schedule. There’s a way to measure that keeps names, contact details, and what someone was looking for out of the data, and we’ll get into what that looks like, and what it costs, later this month.

“You don’t need to understand the code. You need someone who can tell you, in writing, what your website sends and where it goes.”

Why does website tracking matter more in behavioral health?

A single page visit can reveal more on a behavioral health website than almost anywhere else. Someone reading about eating disorder treatment, addiction recovery, or a teen anxiety program at two in the morning is telling the website something deeply private, often before they’ve told anyone in their life. Every owner I know would protect that person in a session, and the website deserves the same standard.

Think about what it took for that person to land on your page. Weeks of wondering. Maybe a search they cleared from their history afterward. They’re trusting you before they’ve ever met you.

When the FTC announced its Cerebral order in April 2024, then FTC Chair Lina M. Khan described the company as “revealing their most sensitive mental health conditions across the Internet.” That’s the line that stays with me. Our field asks people to trust us with the hardest thing in their lives, and the first place they test that trust is the website.

“Our field asks people to trust us with the hardest thing in their lives. The first place they test that trust is the website.”

I’m not writing this to scare anybody. Every owner I know would want to see what their website sends. That’s the whole point. You can’t fix what nobody’s shown you, and once you’ve seen the pothole, you can’t unsee it.

Connection is what brings someone to your practice, and connection runs on trust. That trust starts long before the first phone call. It starts with what your website does with someone’s curiosity when they think nobody’s watching.

I’ll leave you with this one: When was the last time anyone at your practice looked at what your website sends out, and who did you ask?

Frequently asked questions

Is the Meta Pixel HIPAA compliant?

No practice should treat the Meta Pixel as HIPAA compliant. HIPAA compliance belongs to the practice, and the pixel’s exposure depends on which pages it fires on and what it sends. HHS guidance says tracking on logged-in pages generally has access to protected health information, which is why tracking belongs off booking, intake, and portal pages.

Did the 2024 court ruling make website tracking safe?

The June 2024 ruling in American Hospital Association v. Becerra vacated one part of HHS’s tracking guidance, covering IP addresses combined with visits to public pages about health conditions. The rest of the guidance remains posted, including its examples about patient portals and appointment booking, and the ruling did not address FTC rules or state privacy laws.

A cookie consent banner does not count as HIPAA authorization. The HHS tracking bulletin states that website banners asking visitors to accept or reject tracking technologies “do not constitute a valid HIPAA authorization.” State privacy laws set their own consent rules, and those rules vary from state to state.

Should a practice remove all tracking from its website?

Removing every tag protects privacy but also removes the practice’s ability to see which marketing produces clients. A more balanced approach keeps tracking off booking, intake, and portal pages and sends ad platforms only generic events with no names, contact details, conditions, or page addresses. Under Beacon’s standard, an ad platform receives a generic conversion event and a hashed IP address, and nothing else.

This article is general information about how website tracking works and what regulators and platforms have published. It is not legal advice. Laws and platform policies change, and a practice with questions about its own obligations should talk to its own attorney or privacy officer.

Every January, the Phones Ring. And Every January, Somebody at a Behavioral Health Practice Acts Surprised

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

For most behavioral health practices, October is the month that decides how that first month of the year goes. January is the most predictable high-demand month on a practice’s calendar, and the three things that break first when it arrives (phone coverage, calendar availability, and follow-up) take weeks to fix. The surge tests capacity first and marketing second, and most of the choices that shape it get made this month.

I want to start the month here because of where September left us. We spent four weeks on what happens to a lead after it arrives, starting with the first phone call and ending with why your ads keep finding the wrong people. All of that was about building a system you can actually see.

October puts a date on it. That system is about to get its biggest test of the year, and the test shows up on the same day every year.

Why is January the most predictable month on a practice’s calendar?

The same pattern repeats every year. Pressure builds through the fall and the holidays, and people act on it once the new year starts. Across the practices Beacon works with, January is the busiest month for new clients, and December brings fewer first appointments and more cancellations right before it.

The rest of the year has a shape too. Volume rises from late August through the fall as school and work routines restart. Summer runs slower for a lot of practices. Then December goes quiet, and the quiet is exactly what fools people.

The national data points the same direction. In the American Psychiatric Association’s November 2025 Healthy Minds Poll, 41 percent of U.S. adults said they expected more holiday stress than the year before, up from 28 percent in 2024. Then in January 2026, the APA reported that 38 percent of Americans planned a mental health New Year’s resolution, including 58 percent of adults ages 18 to 34.

Marketa M. Wills, M.D., M.B.A., the APA’s CEO and Medical Director, put it this way in that January release: “A new year can bring change, possibility, and uncertainty. Feelings of anxiousness underscore the importance of paying attention to how we’re doing and taking practical steps, large or small, to support our mental health.”

Put those together and you can see the arc. People carry the weight through December, decide somewhere in there that this is the year, and pick up the phone once the calendar clears. We broke down the timing in more detail in When Does Behavioral Health Demand Peak During the Year?

“January is the least surprising month on your calendar. It shows up on the same date every single year, and it still catches most practices flat-footed.”

Why do so many practices get caught off guard anyway?

Nothing in the fall forces anyone to plan for January. October feels manageable, last January’s scramble has faded, and planning usually gets triggered by volume. By the time the calls pile up, the fixes that matter most, like adding clinicians or protecting new-client slots, can no longer help that month.

I grew up in Alaska, and nobody there is surprised by winter. You know roughly when it’s coming and roughly how hard it’s going to hit. Nobody gives you credit for getting ready in October. You just get to January without frozen pipes. The people who struggle are the ones who act like this year might be different.

January works the same way for a practice. It’s coming whether the system is ready or not. You either spend October getting ready or spend January reacting.

And I get why it slides. You’re running a practice, and you’re probably still seeing clients yourself. October has its own fires, and a problem that’s three months out doesn’t feel like a problem yet. Nobody wakes up in October thinking about holiday phone coverage.

December makes it worse, because December gives you a false read. Cancellations go up, first appointments drop off, and the schedule looks soft. It’s tempting to approve every time-off request and let everybody breathe. Then the first Monday in January arrives with a voicemail box that’s already full.

That’s exactly why it has to go on the calendar now, with a name next to it. We wrote about the specific reasons this keeps getting pushed back in Why Do Practices Wait Until January to Prepare for January?

What breaks first when January volume arrives?

The phones go first, then the calendar, then the follow-up. Each one was built for an average month. When a normal week’s worth of inquiries shows up in two days, the same front desk, the same schedule template, and the same callback habits have to absorb volume they were never sized for.

The phones. Calls start landing in voicemail during the busiest hours, because the person who answers the phone is also checking people in. Beacon’s published standard is to respond to a new inquiry within five minutes, three minutes if you can. That’s hard enough to hold in October. In January, without a plan, it’s close to impossible.

The calendar. Clinicians walk into January with caseloads that filled up through the fall, and holiday time off takes more slots off the board. A practice can do a beautiful job answering the phone and still have nowhere to put the person.

The follow-up. This is the quiet one. A callback goes unanswered, it gets marked done, and the person never hears from you again. It’s one of the most common patterns we run into, and in January it multiplies.

Here’s the part I want owners to sit with. Those three are really one system. The phone, the calendar, and the follow-up all have to work together, and in most practices they run on three different tools held together by one overworked person. When volume jumps, the person breaks before the tools do.

“Your phones, your calendar, and your follow-up are one system. In most practices that system is one overworked person, and in January the person breaks before the tools do.”

There’s more on how each of those leak points fails, and what fixes it, in Why Do Practices Miss Out on January Demand?

Why does the planning deadline for January land in October?

The slowest fixes take the longest to put in place. Hiring a clinician, getting a new hire credentialed with your payers, rebuilding the schedule template, and settling holiday coverage all take weeks, and some take months. None of them can happen in the few quiet days between Christmas and New Year’s.

Hiring is the slowest, and it isn’t getting easier. The federal Health Resources and Services Administration’s December 2025 workforce brief projects that by 2038, under current conditions, the supply of mental health counselors will meet about 55 percent of demand, and the supply of psychologists about 48 percent. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects about 50,500 openings a year for mental health and substance use counselors through 2035. Every practice hiring for January is fishing in the same pond.

Credentialing adds its own wait, and the wait varies by payer. If you’re adding someone, ask each payer for its current timeline before you make the offer.

Holiday coverage is the one that surprises people most. Somebody has to own the phones from mid-December through mid-January, including the days your front desk lead is on vacation. If that decision gets made on December 20th, it gets made badly.

So the window is now, long before the week between Christmas and New Year’s.

What should a practice owner decide about January this month?

There are five, and every one of them can be settled this month: how many new clients the practice can actually take, who owns new inquiries every business hour through the holidays, how many new-client slots get held on the schedule, what the written follow-up rhythm is, and how January’s results will be measured. Each one needs a name and a date attached.

Here’s how I’d break it down.

  • Your real capacity number. Get to an actual number. How many new clients can your clinicians take in January without wearing out the people you already serve? If nobody knows, that’s the first conversation.
  • Phone ownership, by name. Who answers new-inquiry calls during every business hour from mid-December through mid-January, and who backs them up? It needs to be someone whose other job won’t constantly pull them away from it.
  • Held new-client slots. Protect them on the January schedule now, before the fall caseload quietly fills them.
  • A written follow-up rhythm. Each practice sets its own with its clinical leadership. Decide what counts as “contacted” (a person was actually reached, and a voicemail doesn’t count), and make sure any inquiry that suggests someone may be at risk skips the routine cadence and goes straight to your clinical protocol.
  • How you’ll measure it. If you can’t tell in February which campaigns, which calls, and which callbacks turned into clients, you can’t repeat January. You can only hope it happens again.

If it helps to see it on a calendar, here’s how I’d sequence it. In early October, settle the capacity number and decide if you’re adding clinicians or hours, so any job posting goes up now. By the end of October, set your holiday time-off rules, name who covers new-inquiry calls from mid-December through mid-January, and start credentialing for anyone already hired. In November, build the January schedule template with protected new-client slots, and put the follow-up rhythm in writing so the front desk isn’t making it up in the moment.

None of the planning requires new software or a consultant. It requires an owner, an office manager, and a few focused hours that October still has room for.

Hold onto the measurement piece, though, because it’s where this whole month is headed, and we’ll land there by the end of October.

Only after all of that is in place should you think about what to run. We put together seven New Year campaign ideas for behavioral health practices a while back, and they’re a good place to start. Just make sure the phones can take it before you turn up the volume.

“Don’t spend a dollar making January louder until you know your practice can answer it.”

Why does January readiness matter beyond the numbers?

The person calling in the first week of January is often keeping a promise they made to themselves in December. They decided this was the year, and they picked up the phone. Whether anyone answers is the practice’s decision, and it gets made months before that call comes in.

Think about who’s on the other end. Somebody who white-knuckled their way through the holidays. Somebody who sat with a decision for weeks and finally worked up the nerve. A lot of them reach out to more than one practice because they’re trying to find anyone who can help, and fast.

If that person gets voicemail, the next move is usually the next name on the list. Or they put the phone down and decide to try again next month, and next month turns into next year.

There’s a second group this protects, and that’s your team. A January scramble lands on the front desk, the intake coordinator, and the clinicians who pick up extra hours to cover. I’m firmly against hustle culture, and a predictable surge that nobody planned for is exactly how good people burn out. Planning in October is how you take care of them in January.

In January, connection starts with somebody picking up the phone.

“January readiness protects two groups of people: the ones calling for help, and the team you’re asking to answer.”

So here’s the question I’d ask any owner sitting across the table from me: What broke first at your practice last January, and what have you changed since?

Frequently asked questions

When should a behavioral health practice start preparing for January?

A behavioral health practice should start preparing for January in October. Hiring, payer credentialing, holiday phone coverage, and schedule templates all take weeks or months to change. By December, most of those fixes can no longer help the January calendar, so each decision needs an owner and a date this month.

Should a practice spend more on ads in January?

More ad spend in January only helps if the practice can answer, schedule, and follow up with the extra inquiries. Confirm phone coverage, held new-client slots, and a written follow-up rhythm first. Adding volume to a system that is already missing calls raises the cost of every client who does book.

How can a practice estimate how many inquiries to expect in January?

A practice can estimate January volume from its own records. Count new inquiries and first appointments by month for the last two to three years, then compare January to the yearly average. A practice’s own history is a better guide than any national figure, because its market, payers, and services shape the pattern.

What breaks first when January demand arrives?

Phone coverage usually breaks first, followed by calendar availability and follow-up. Calls reach voicemail during busy hours, new-client slots are already filled from the fall, and a single callback attempt gets logged as “contacted.” All three depend on the same few people, which is why they tend to fail together.

Why Do Your Ads Keep Finding the Wrong People?

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

By Adrienne Wilkerson | Published September 28, 2026 | Last updated September 28, 2026

Your ads are learning exactly what you taught them. That’s the problem.

Ad platforms like Google and Meta optimize toward whatever event you tell them counts as a conversion. If every form fill counts, including the person whose insurance you don’t take, the platform gets better at finding more people who fill out forms. If only a right-fit inquiry counts, it gets better at finding right-fit people. The budget is the same either way. What you’re buying is completely different.

I’ve been thinking about this all month, because it’s where every conversation we’ve had in September ends up. We talked about marketing and intake disagreeing about what a good lead even is. We talked about which marketing actually filled your schedule. We talked about the first phone call. All of that work happens inside your practice. This week is about what happens next: getting what your team learns about each lead back to the ad platforms you’re paying every month. Your marketing partner should be the one handling the platform side. Your part is making sure what intake learns actually reaches them.

Because in most practices, it never does. The ad platforms get funded every month, and the one piece of information that would make them smarter stays in the CRM.

What are your ads actually learning from?

Your ads learn from the conversion action you mark as primary, and in most behavioral health accounts that action is a form submission or a phone call. Google’s own documentation says primary conversion actions are the ones used for bidding. Everything the algorithm does with your money is aimed at producing more of that one event.

Here’s the thing. A form fill tells the platform that somebody filled out a form. That’s all it knows.

It doesn’t know that intake called them back and found out they have a plan you’ve never been in-network with. It doesn’t know they were looking for a service you don’t offer. It doesn’t know they booked, didn’t show, and never answered again. From the platform’s point of view, that person was a win. So it goes looking for more people who look like them.

Google says as much in its guidance on primary and secondary conversion actions: primary actions feed bidding, secondary actions are there for you to watch. Most of the practice owners I talk to have never opened that setting. Honestly, most of them don’t know it exists. You went to school to help people. Conversion goals were never on the syllabus.

But you’re still the one signing off on the spend.

“Your ad platform is obedient. It will spend every dollar you give it chasing whatever you told it a win looks like.”

Why do the wrong people keep filling out your form?

The wrong people fill out your form because they’re hunting, and in behavioral health the hunt is brutal. Someone who needs care often has to contact several practices before one takes their insurance, and every one of those attempts looks like a conversion to the ad platform that sent them.

We see this with our clients constantly. A practice is clear on its website about which plans it accepts. It’s on the insurance page. It’s in the FAQ. Sometimes it’s on the contact page itself. And the form fills still come in from people with plans the practice doesn’t take.

I get frustrated about it on the client’s behalf, and then I remember what the person on the other side is up against. They’re exhausted, and they’re filling out every form they can find.

The data backs that up. In an October 2025 data brief, the HHS Office of Inspector General found that Medicare Advantage plans’ networks included, on average, just 16 percent of a county’s behavioral health workforce, and Medicaid managed care plans averaged 31 percent. The same report found that on average, 55 percent of the behavioral health providers listed in Medicare Advantage networks didn’t provide a single service to enrollees in 2023.

Think about what that means for the person searching. The directory their plan gave them is full of names that won’t work. So they go to Google. They click, they fill out a form, they move on to the next one, and they do it again.

The commercial side isn’t much better. An April 2024 RTI International study found that patients went out-of-network 3.5 times more often for a behavioral health clinician than for a medical or surgical one, and 10.6 times more often for a psychologist. The study’s lead author, Tami L. Mark, Ph.D., summed up the network gap this way: health plans “are not using the same measures” to strengthen their behavioral health networks that they use for medical ones.

So when a person with the wrong insurance lands on your form, blame the system they’re stuck in. Your part of the problem starts when your ad account counts them as a success and pays to find more of them.

What happened when we changed what counted as a win?

When we changed what counted as a conversion, the platforms started getting a cleaner signal, because the only people reaching the finish line were people the practice could actually serve. The fix started as a form fix. It turned into an ad fix without anyone having to rebuild the campaign.

Here’s what we do for clients who keep getting inquiries they can’t take.

We add one question near the top of the contact form: which insurance do you have? Usually it’s a drop-down with the plans the practice accepts, plus “Other” and “I don’t have insurance.”

If the person picks one of the listed plans, the form keeps going like normal.

If they pick “Other” or “none,” they land on a page that tells them, kindly and plainly, that the practice doesn’t accept their insurance. Then it gives them a choice. They can stop right there, or they can keep going as a self-pay client.

And here’s the part that matters for your ad budget. The conversion only fires when someone finishes on a qualified path. The in-network person who completes the form counts. The self-pay person who chooses to keep going counts. The person who learns it’s not a fit and stops there doesn’t count, so the platform never learns to go find more of them.

Nobody got turned away rudely. Nobody wasted twenty minutes waiting for a callback that was always going to be a no. And the ad platform quietly started learning from a much more honest signal.

We test things on Beacon first before we roll them out to clients, and this was no different. Beacon has a threshold for the practices we can serve well, based on budget and team size. It’s on our website. We’re explicit about it. And we still get inquiries from practices that are well under it.

So our own form works the same way now. If someone selects a budget or staff size below our threshold, they go to a separate form that tells them we’re happy to talk, but they’re under our threshold and we may not be the best fit. They get to decide whether to keep going.

I will be the first to admit that felt a little uncomfortable at first. Nobody in business loves writing a sentence that tells a potential client “maybe not us.” But people hate being sold. They love being told the truth. And letting someone self-select out is one of the most respectful things a form can do.

“The kindest thing your contact form can do is tell someone the truth before they spend twenty minutes waiting on a callback that was always going to be a no.”

Is a smarter form enough, or do you need to send lead quality back to the platform?

A smarter form is the right first step, but it only filters what someone can know about themselves at the moment they fill it out. Insurance is knowable at the form. Whether a person is a good clinical fit, whether they show up, and whether they stay are not. Those answers live in your CRM, and getting them back to the ad platform is a separate job.

That’s where offline conversions come in. Your intake team grades the lead in the CRM, and an approved signal goes back to the platform that says, in effect, “this one was worth having.” Stephanie wrote the mechanics of that this week in how to send lead quality back to your ad platforms, including what should never leave your building. In behavioral health, that last part isn’t optional. Your CRM knows things about people that an ad platform has no business holding.

What I want owners to hold onto is the order of operations.

  • Start with what’s knowable at the form. Insurance, location, service type, self-pay willingness. If a question would let someone self-select out, ask it before the conversion fires.
  • Grade leads the same way every time. You can’t send quality back if nobody recorded it. This is the whole reason we spent September on definitions and CRM fields.
  • Pick a milestone the platform can actually learn from. This is where owners get tripped up. Google recommends measuring Target CPA performance over the last 30 days, with at least 30 conversions. If you only count “became a client,” a practice with 10 or 15 staff may never hit that in a month. A qualified lead or a scheduled first session is often the more useful signal.

That third one is a judgment call, and it’s different for every practice. Go too broad and you’re back to rewarding form fills. Go too narrow and the platform doesn’t have enough to learn from. Somebody has to own that call and revisit it.

“Every month you don’t send lead quality back, you’re paying full price for an algorithm that’s only allowed to learn half the lesson.”

What should a practice owner actually ask for?

A practice owner should ask what the ad account is optimizing toward, and whether that event means a right-fit person or just a completed form. That one question tells you more about whether your ad spend is working than a stack of monthly reports.

You don’t need to learn the platforms. You need to ask better questions of the people running them. Here are the ones I’d bring to your next marketing meeting.

  • “What is our primary conversion action, exactly?” If the answer is “all form submissions,” that’s your starting point.
  • “Can someone who isn’t a fit still trigger a conversion?” If yes, ask what it would take to stop that.
  • “What happens to our lead grades after intake?” If they stay in the CRM and never reach the ad account, the ads are only learning from the website.
  • “What does it actually cost us to get a client?” That number is almost always higher than cost per lead, and it’s the only one that tells you what the budget bought.

If you want to go deeper, we’ve answered a few of these on their own: what marketing metrics should a practice owner review monthly, what is cost per acquired client in behavioral health, and why is cost per lead a misleading metric. We’ve also written about why lead volume doesn’t predict revenue, which is the same problem seen from the reporting side.

One warning. When you tighten what counts as a conversion, the conversion number in your account goes down. It’s supposed to. You stopped counting people who were never going to become clients. If whoever runs your ads panics at that dip, or you do, you’ll undo the fix before it has a chance to work. Decide ahead of time that you’re going to judge this on qualified leads and new clients, and give it room.

That’s the kind of setup our paid advertising team builds and watches for clients every day, because the details of getting it right, and keeping it compliant, add up fast.

Why does this matter beyond the budget?

This matters beyond the budget because every conversion you count is a real person who reached out on what might have been a very hard day. When your system rewards the wrong reach-outs, it spends your money sending more people toward a door that was never going to open for them.

I think about that person a lot. They finally worked up the nerve to look for help. They found a practice that looked right. They filled out the form, and then they waited. Maybe a day. Maybe three. And the call they got back was, “I’m sorry, we don’t take your plan.”

Nobody did anything wrong in that story, and it still hurts. Multiply it by every ad dollar pointed at the wrong audience and you’ve got a practice that’s spending money to create disappointment. That’s not what anyone got into this field to do.

When you fix what counts, two things get better at once. Your budget stops funding misses, and the people who aren’t a fit find out sooner, from you, kindly, while they still have the energy to keep looking. The better the connection, the more likely somebody is to become a client, or to recognize you’re not the right fit and move on without losing a week.

“Good behavioral health marketing helps the wrong-fit person find their next door faster.”

That’s what I mean when I say marketing is human-to-human connection. The conversions follow when you get the connection right. And the platforms you’re paying every month can only learn what a real connection looks like if someone tells them.

So here’s what I’d love to know from you. What’s the one question your intake team asks on every first call that you wish your ads already knew the answer to?

Frequently asked questions

Why do my ads bring in leads with insurance we don’t accept? Ad platforms optimize toward whatever counts as a conversion in your account. If every form submission counts, the platform learns to find more people who submit forms, including people with plans you don’t take. Adding an insurance question before the conversion fires, and only counting qualified completions, gives the platform a cleaner signal to learn from.

Should a practice stop counting all form fills as conversions? Most practices should narrow what counts, but not all at once. Start by making sure someone who clearly isn’t a fit, such as an out-of-network inquiry who chooses not to continue, can’t trigger the conversion. Then decide whether qualified leads or scheduled sessions give the platform enough volume to learn from.

How many conversions does an ad platform need to learn? It depends on the platform and bid strategy. For Target CPA, Google recommends evaluating performance over the last 30 days with at least 30 conversions. Smaller practices often need a milestone earlier than “became a client,” such as a qualified lead, so the platform has enough signal to work with.

Is it safe to send lead quality back to Google or Meta in behavioral health? It can be, with care. The platform should receive only a minimal, approved conversion signal, never diagnosis, treatment, insurance, or clinical details. Event names should be generic. Because protected health information may be involved, your compliance or legal team should approve the workflow before anything goes live.

Will my conversion numbers drop if I change what counts? Yes, and that’s expected. When you stop counting inquiries that were never going to become clients, the conversion total falls. Judge the change on qualified leads, new clients, and cost per acquired client over a reasonable window instead of the raw conversion count.

This article is general information about marketing and advertising practices and is not legal or compliance advice.

The First Phone Call Is Your Whole Marketing Budget

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

Everything you spent to get found gets settled in about four minutes by whoever happened to be free.

The first phone call is where a behavioral health practice either collects on its marketing investment or loses it. Every dollar spent on visibility buys exactly one thing, which is a person deciding to reach out. What happens in the first few minutes after that decision determines whether they book, show up, and stay.

Most practice owners have never made a deliberate choice about who holds those four minutes. The phone gets answered by whoever is closest to it. The web form goes to an inbox somebody checks when things slow down. That is not a staffing oversight. It is the largest unmanaged variable in the entire marketing budget, and it sits outside of every report anyone is reading.

I want to walk through what it looks like when you actually go find it.

What happens when you go through thirty days of leads one at a time?

You find out where the money actually went, and it is rarely one clean answer. Often the marketing worked, or at least was not the whole problem. We almost always find something on our side worth tightening too. What neither report shows you is what happened to each inquiry after it landed.

We did this with a client who was frustrated, and justifiably so. She was spending a significant amount for the size of her clinic and she was not seeing new clients on her roster. Every time we talked, we kept telling her the leads were good. She kept telling us her schedule said otherwise.

So we sat down together and went through every single lead that came in over a thirty day period, one by one, because we had tracking in place that could account for all of them.

This was a small practice. Three therapists. No real front desk presence. The owner was the person calling everybody back.

The same story kept coming up. She got the call. She saw the voicemail. She could not answer because she was in with a patient, and so was everybody else. When she had an opening, which was sometimes two or three days later, she called the person back. Most often she got nothing. No return call, or a polite note that they had already gone somewhere else.

Some of those calls did not get returned for a week. Some never got returned at all. The form fills were essentially never answered.

I want to be careful here, because none of that was carelessness. She knew. She was losing sleep over the calls she could not return and she did not know what else to do about it. You cannot walk out of a session to answer a phone. You also cannot justify paying somebody to sit at a desk when you are three therapists deep and every dollar is already spoken for. She was stuck between a rock and a hard place and she had been stuck there for a long time, doing the best anyone could do with two bad options.

That audit gave us a short list of things to fix on our side too, which is normal. There is always something to sharpen in the targeting or the messaging or the forms themselves. None of it was the reason her schedule had holes in it.

Her marketing was working. The leads were real. The money was landing in a building that had no way to catch it.

That conversation was brutal, and it was brutal because there was nobody to hand it to. She was the owner, the clinician, and the intake department. I will be honest, those are the hardest meetings we have.

Why is the first phone call the most expensive four minutes in your practice?

Because everything upstream of it is already paid for. The ads, the search visibility, the website, the months of showing up consistently so that somebody in your town knows your name when they finally decide to do something. All of that spending buys the reach-out and nothing past it.

The four minutes after the reach-out are where that purchase either converts into a human being on your calendar or evaporates.

And the failure is more routine than most owners want to believe. A secret shopper study published in JAMA on July 31, 2024, by researchers at Weill Cornell Medicine, called psychiatric clinicians listed in Medicaid managed care directories across four major cities. Only 18 percent of them were reachable, accepted the plan, and offered an appointment. The detail that should stop you sits further down in the findings. Among the sampled clinicians where no appointment could be made, 35 percent did not answer the phone on either of two call attempts, and another 15 percent had incorrect or out of service phone numbers.

A 2026 secret shopper survey published in The American Journal of Managed Care, covering mental health counselors in Pennsylvania’s Marketplace plans, found the same thing from another direction. Of the listings researchers could verify, 65.2 percent carried at least one inaccuracy, an incorrect phone number was the single most common problem at 56.6 percent, and appointments were available with only 14.9 percent of providers, with an average of 33.2 days between the call and the scheduled appointment.

Those studies were designed to measure insurance network accuracy. What they actually measured is how often the front door of a behavioral health practice does not open.

So what is the actual window? Three to five minutes. Five is the outside edge and three is better.

That is not a number I pulled out of our own dashboards and decided to publish. In July I was on a panel at the Recovery.com Marketing Summit in Madison, roughly 120 behavioral health marketers in one building, in-house teams and agency people who compete with each other for the same clients. The response time question came up repeatedly across the three days, and the number landed in the same place every time. Three to five minutes, from every corner of the room.

I have been in this industry a long time and I can tell you that 120 marketers do not agree on much. They agreed on this.

Past that window, the person you spent months and real money to reach has usually moved to the next name on their list. How fast should a practice respond to a new inquiry is a question worth settling out loud in your own practice, with a number your team has actually agreed to and somebody whose job it is to hit it.

What separates a scripted intake call from a trained one?

A script hands somebody information. Training helps somebody make a decision. The first one is easy to build and the second one is where the return on your marketing actually lives.

The baseline is real and it matters. Anybody answering your phone needs foundational knowledge of the business. Your services. Your providers. Who each provider treats and what kinds of cases they take. That part can be written down and taught in an afternoon.

Then the nuance starts, and the nuance depends on you. An inpatient treatment facility and a clinic specializing in ABA therapy for autistic children and a two-person practice handling couples work are three completely different conversations. The questions are different, and so is the way people respond to them.

Some of what the person answering your phone needs is motivational interviewing. SAMHSA’s TIP 35, Enhancing Motivation for Change in Substance Use Disorder Treatment, describes motivational approaches as a way of partnering with a person who is ambivalent about change rather than persuading them out of it. That is a clinical framework and I am not going to pretend otherwise. But a surface level understanding of it in the hands of the person answering your phone changes what that call sounds like.

Here is the difference in practice. Gathering information sounds like name, age, availability, insurance. Connection sounds like this: that sounds really hard, I can’t imagine how difficult it has been to carry that, and I’m so glad you had the courage to call today.

Gathering the information is the baseline. The affirming piece is the part that decides whether somebody books or just collects your prices and hangs up.

That is not a script. It is a trained response to something a person said thirty seconds earlier, and it requires that the person answering the phone was actually listening.

So build it deliberately. A clinician sits down and role plays the calls that come in all the time. The person answering writes down the questions they get and asks directly, how do you want me to answer this one. Is price something I can give over the phone. What do I say when somebody asks whether you treat what they have.

And they need to know your providers past the data. Not just which modalities each one takes, but why. A person who understands why a clinician chose to work with a certain population can speak from a place of authority and empathy instead of reading a directory out loud. That is the whole of what should happen on a first intake call.

How do you know whether your front door is the problem?

You ask four questions, and most practices cannot answer any of them. How fast did somebody pick up. Was the call recorded. How many of those calls resulted in a booked appointment. Of those booked, how many actually showed.

When we have a discrepancy, where the marketing side is reporting plenty of leads and the internal side is saying nothing is converting, we sit down with the owner or the marketing director and whoever runs the front desk, and we go lead by lead. We do not point fingers. We just ask questions.

Who got to talk to this person. What did they say. When a practice is tracking internally, the answers come fast, and they are usually some version of nobody called them back, or we called two hours later when there was a break and got voicemail.

More often than not, that tracking does not exist. So the questions land in silence, and that silence is the finding.

Until the tracking exists, you can’t find the holes. Everything after that is guessing with more confidence.

The order runs the same way almost every time. First it is a tracking problem, because nobody is measuring what happens after the inquiry arrives. Then it is an ownership problem, because no single person is responsible for the response. Then it is a capacity problem, because the person who technically owns it is also doing four other jobs. That last one is real, and it is not a character flaw. It is the natural result of a practice that grew faster than its front door did. We wrote about the reporting gap between marketing and intake earlier this month, and this is the operational floor underneath it.

What if your practice is too small to staff the phone?

Then build the front door before you buy more traffic. I would rather tell somebody that in a sales conversation than explain it in a renewal conversation a year later.

We ask a lot more questions about internal operations now than we used to. Do you have time to respond to leads. Do you have a dedicated person who can answer the phone when it rings or call back within five minutes. Do you have a way to respond to form fills and email requests for appointments.

Some owners are surprised their marketing agency is asking. Some get defensive. And if a practice does not have a system and does not have somebody responsible for it, we will tell them to put that in place before they hire us, or anybody else. Spending marketing money into a building that cannot answer the phone is the cart in front of the horse, and I do not want to take money I know is going to be wasted.

If you don’t have somebody who can answer the phone, the honest advice is to fix that before you hire any agency, including mine.

There is a real catch-22 underneath this. A practice is not big enough to afford a full time intake person, but it needs somebody in that seat to book enough clients to grow to the point where it can afford one.

That gap is where the tooling has gotten genuinely useful. Online scheduling. Forms built to push somebody toward booking instead of toward a callback. Chat trained on the practice’s own intake flow. There are services now, like Anonymous Health or others in that category, that will coach a front desk person through a live call, listening to how the prospective patient answers and prompting what to ask next, with motivational interviewing built into the system. Some of these tools will answer the phone themselves and identify as AI while walking somebody all the way to a booked appointment.

None of that is as good as a well trained human being. I want to be clear about that, because it would be easy to oversell it. But for a practice trying to grow without a dedicated person, it is a real bridge between where they are and where they are going. I have been spending a lot of time on this particular gap lately, and I think what is available to a small practice a year from now looks considerably different than what is available today.

What is the person on the other end of that call actually deciding?

Whether to keep looking. That is it. They are not evaluating your credentials on that call, because they already did that before they dialed. They are deciding whether the place they just called feels like a place that will help them.

Clint Mally, VP of Content at Recovery.com, put an equation on this when I sat down with him on Recovery.com’s podcast earlier this year, and I have been using it ever since. “Empathy + authority = trust.” Two questions are running in a person’s head the whole time. Do they understand what I am going through, and can they actually help me. The first one is empathy. The second is authority. Miss either one and you do not get trust.

We were talking about websites when he said it. It applies harder to the phone, because on a website a person is reading. On the phone somebody is answering, and that person either demonstrates both of those things in four minutes or does not.

Most people call more than one practice. That is not disloyalty, it is what people do when something matters and they are scared. Why prospective clients contact more than one practice comes down to the same thing every time, which is that they are trying to find the one that feels different.

Your marketing earned the reach-out. It cannot win the tiebreaker. The only thing that wins the tiebreaker is the four minutes, and the four minutes belong to a person whose job title probably does not include the word marketing and whose training budget is probably zero.

That is where I keep landing on this one. Owners ask me constantly where to put the next dollar. There are months where the honest answer is not another campaign. It is training the person who picks up the phone, and buying a way to know what happened on the calls you already paid for. That is the cheapest unclaimed return in most practices I sit down with, and almost nobody is spending there.

If you want help figuring out what is actually happening between your marketing and your schedule, our team is happy to walk through it with you.

So here is my question for you. Have you ever listened to a recording of somebody at your practice answering a call from a person who found you for the first time? Not a summary of it. The actual call. If you have, what did you hear that you did not expect?

Somewhere in that same conversation is a number your team has probably never agreed on out loud. I wrote a short piece on it: [How fast should a practice respond to a new inquiry?](https://www.beaconmm.com/blog/how-fast-should-a-practice-respond-to-a-new-inquiry/)

Frequently asked questions

How fast should a behavioral health practice respond to a new inquiry?

Faster than most practices are set up to move. Beacon’s working standard is five minutes as the outside edge and three minutes as the target for returning a call or a form fill. Past that window, most people seeking care have moved to the next practice on their list.

What is the difference between a scripted intake call and a trained one?

A script delivers information about services, providers, and availability. A trained intake conversation gathers that same information while responding to what the person actually said. SAMHSA describes motivational approaches as partnering with someone who is ambivalent rather than persuading them, and that framework shapes how trained intake staff listen.

Should a small practice hire a marketing agency before it has an intake process?

No. Marketing spending buys inquiries, and inquiries require somebody responsible for answering them within minutes. A practice without that capacity will pay for reach it cannot convert. Building the response system first, even with scheduling tools or trained chat, protects the marketing investment that follows.

What should a practice track about its first-contact calls?

Four things at minimum. How quickly someone answered or returned the contact, whether the call was recorded, how many contacts became booked appointments, and how many booked appointments were kept. Without those four numbers, a practice cannot tell a marketing problem from an intake problem.

Can AI tools replace a front desk person at a behavioral health practice?

Not as effectively as a well trained human. Live-coaching tools, trained chat, and AI phone intake that identifies itself can bridge the gap for a practice too small to staff the role full time. They are a bridge to a dedicated person, not a substitute for one.

Which Marketing Actually Filled Your Schedule?

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

Which Marketing Actually Filled Your Schedule?

Every owner I sit down with asks me some version of this question. Which channel filled my schedule. Where did my actual clients come from. Tell me where to put the money next quarter.

Even three years ago I could answer that. I could hand you a report that traced a person from an ad to a form fill to a phone call to a chair in your office, and the line was clean enough to make decisions on.

That answer doesn’t exist anymore. And the practices that are still waiting for someone to hand it to them are making budget decisions on a number that stopped being real a while ago.

Why can’t anyone give you a straight answer anymore?

Traditional attribution, the way we used to be able to track it, is dying. Privacy changes ate part of it. Platform walls ate another part. And now AI has inserted itself in the middle of the whole thing, which means a person can spend three weeks getting oriented to their own problem inside a chatbot, arrive at your website already knowing your name, and show up in your analytics as direct traffic with no history attached. Pew looked at the browsing behavior of 900 adults across nearly 69,000 real searches and found that when an AI summary sat at the top of the page, people clicked through to an actual website 8 percent of the time, against 15 percent when there was no summary. Half the clicks gone, and the half that vanished still went somewhere. They just stopped leaving a trail on the way.

None of that means we stop tracking. I want to be clear about that, because “attribution is dead” gets used as a permission slip to stop measuring anything. We track as much as we possibly can. We just have to be honest that the numbers are fuzzier than they were, and that anyone handing you a dashboard that claims Facebook drove twelve clients last month is telling you a story with more confidence than the data earned.

Traditional attribution is dying. That doesn’t mean we stop trying to track things. It means we stop pretending the numbers are more precise than they are.

Here’s the part I actually find interesting. This is bringing marketing back around to something older. Word of mouth counts again. Referrals count. Reputation counts. A rising tide lifts all ships, and that’s as true across your marketing channels as it is anywhere else. Your paid ads work better because your brand is familiar. Your brand is familiar because your content shows up. Your content shows up because other credible places cite you.

Pull any one of those apart and try to assign it a dollar value and you’ll be wrong. Nielsen has been asking people what they trust for two decades and the answer barely moves. Recommendations from people they know beat every paid channel by a wide margin, every time they run it. Google’s own research into how people decide calls the middle of that process messy for a reason, because it loops and doubles back and refuses to behave like a funnel. Run your channels together and the whole thing lifts.

So what should you be watching instead?

Back up. Look at the whole picture.

That means watching brand signals alongside campaign metrics. Are the large language models mentioning your practice? Are they recommending you when someone asks for help in your city? Is your social activity generating comments and shares and saves, not just impressions? Are credible publications citing you? Is your authority score trending up? Is your branded search volume climbing, meaning more people are typing your name specifically instead of a generic service phrase?

Those are the questions I’d be asking now, and most owners have never seen a report that includes any of them.

And I know how that sounds. “Look at the whole picture” is exactly what a mediocre agency says when a client asks a hard question. It’s the sentence people hide behind when they don’t want to be held to anything. I’ve sat across from owners who inherited that answer from the agency before us, and they heard it correctly as “we can’t tell you, and you can’t fire us over it.”

So let me put the accountability back on the table.

What should your marketing actually be held to?

Trend lines. Read like a stock chart.

Your traffic, form fills, phone calls, social referrals, and paid traffic should all be moving in the right direction over a rolling 30, 60, and 90 days. Any individual day or week will bounce. That’s noise, and reacting to noise is how good campaigns get killed in month two. What matters is the direction when you back up far enough to see it.

Any single week will fluctuate. Back up to a rolling 30, 60, 90 and the overall trend should be going up. That’s the number you hold your marketing to.

If the trend is flat or falling, then we go service by service and find out why. Not “marketing is down” and throw up your hands and quit there. Which service. SEO, paid, content, social, email, each one gets looked at on its own, because the days when a practice ran one or two channels and you could just adjust the one dial are over. More channels means more places for something to quietly stop working, and finding it takes actual digging.

That’s going deep, that’s asking the hard questions until you get an answer, that’s what a quality agency does until they figure it out. This is what you get to hold your marketing partner to. A flat trend line is a flat trend line, and there’s nowhere to hide it.

Your numbers are up and your schedule still isn’t full. Now what?

This is the scenario that taught us the most, and I’ll be honest, we learned it the hard way.

Everything on the marketing side climbing. Traffic up, calls up, form fills up. And the owner is understandably frustrated because the schedule hasn’t moved, and from where she’s sitting the obvious explanation is that the marketing isn’t working.

We’ve seen it land in one of two places. Usually both at once.

The leads are wrong. We’re generating volume, and the wrong people are filling out the form. They want insurance and the practice is self pay. They have insurance the practice doesn’t take. They’re in a state the practice isn’t licensed in. They need a level of care the practice doesn’t provide. When that’s what’s happening, the only way to find out is to sit down with the client and go through leads one at a time, name by name, asking what happened with this person and why they weren’t a fit. Then we take that back to the messaging and the form and the targeting, because attracting the wrong person is a marketing problem and it’s ours to fix.

The leads are right and nothing happens to them. This is the harder conversation. The right person raised their hand and the practice didn’t catch it.

Ken and Denali started asking questions that were technically outside our scope. How fast does a missed call get returned? How fast does a form fill get a response? Who owns the phone? What happens after a no-show? Is there a person whose actual job is verifying insurance and walking someone from first contact to first appointment?

The answers sent us into a different kind of work than we signed up for. Days to return a call, sometimes weeks. No owner of the phone. Nothing at all in place for a missed appointment. A practice would invest real money getting people to the door and have almost no way to get them through it. That gap between marketing and operations is where the money quietly disappears, and nobody on either side of it is winning.

How do I know inside of five minutes?

Vagueness. That’s the whole tell, and it shows up in her numbers before it shows up anywhere else.

I’ll ask how many new clients the practice can absorb this month. What I’m listening for is a number. What I usually get is “more.”

Then I’ll ask what a client is worth over the course of their care, and how long a typical client stays. Those two figures decide what she can afford to spend to bring one through the door, which means they quietly set her entire marketing budget. Most owners I meet have never sat down and worked either one out.

Ask who owns the phone and listen for whether you get a name or a job title. “My front desk person” is a different answer than “Marcy,” and the gap between them tells you whether anyone is actually accountable for what happens when it rings.

A practice that can’t tell you what a client is worth is guessing at every marketing decision it makes, including the ones it’s about to blame on the agency.

No judgement here, trust me, I’ve been there! Running a growing business often means going from fire to fire just trying to survive. The process lives in your head because there was never a quiet week to write it down, and intentionality is a luxury most owners, like us, feel we can’t afford.

It’s still the reason a perfectly good marketing budget produces an empty calendar, and no amount of additional traffic fixes it.

Here’s the good news. This is one of the more fixable problems that lands on an owner’s desk. Marketing and operations can work together beautifully once somebody names the handoff out loud and puts a real person’s name on it, and I’ve watched practices turn this around in a quarter.

What this really costs

Here’s where I want to land. We started with a question about which marketing filled your schedule, and this is the part that actually decides it.

Every inquiry you got last month has a price on it. You already paid it. Take what you spent, divide it by the number of people who raised their hand, and that’s what it cost you to make one phone ring. In this industry it’s rarely a small number.

Now go back to the form fill that sat for three days. You bought that one at the same price as the one that booked. Everything that separates those two outcomes happened after the money was already out the door.

That’s the part that gets me. An owner will spend an hour arguing about ad spend and about four minutes on what happens in the first hour after an inquiry lands, when the first hour is where the return on that spend gets decided. Doubling the budget without fixing that just buys more of the same result.

Five minutes, not five days.

You’re not buying clicks. You’re buying the chance to be the practice that somebody actually reaches.

Marketing fills the pipe. A full schedule happens when somebody is standing on the other side of the door when that person finally knocks.

So here’s my question for you this week. Take last month’s marketing spend and divide it by the number of inquiries it produced. Then find out how many of those got a real response inside the first hour.

Hold those two numbers next to each other and tell me what you see. I’d genuinely like to know.

When Marketing and Intake Both Think They’re Right

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

Two reports land on your desk in the same week. Marketing says lead volume is up and the campaigns are working. Intake says the leads are garbage and they’re spending their days on people who were never going to book.

You’d like one of them to be wrong. Wrong is easy. Wrong you can fix with a conversation, a correction, maybe a different vendor.

Here’s the thing. In almost every practice I’ve walked into, both teams are telling the truth.

Why does the same lead look good to one team and bad to another?

Marketing is measuring against a definition. Intake is measuring against a different definition. Both are counting accurately. Neither one wrote their definition down, and nobody ever put the two side by side to see whether they matched.

To marketing, a good lead is a person who found you, understood enough to reach out, and gave you their contact information. That’s a real accomplishment and it costs real money to produce, whether it came from organic search or paid ads.

To intake, a good lead is a person who answers the phone, has coverage that works, is ready to start in the next two weeks, and shows up to the first session. Also a completely reasonable definition.

The same human being can be an A lead by the first standard and a C lead by the second one. Both teams look at that person, look at their own numbers, and walk away certain the other department is the problem.

Nobody being wrong is worse than somebody being wrong. When somebody is wrong, there’s something to correct. When everybody is right, the argument can run for years.

What does it cost to leave two honest people arguing?

Let me be honest with you about a version of this I lived at Beacon.

Two people on my own team reported lead numbers to me every week, and every week the numbers didn’t match. Not wildly. Just enough that I couldn’t put both figures in the same sentence without one of them contradicting the other.

So I did what a lot of owners do. I asked them to meet, work out the difference, and report back. Reasonable request. Two capable adults, one afternoon, done.

It took almost two months.

Meetings got scheduled and postponed. Somebody had a conflict. Somebody had a deadline. And when I finally stopped asking for a report and put them in a room instead, the answer took about twenty minutes. They were counting different things. We hashed it out until we agreed on what each term meant, and then we wrote it down.

Twenty minutes of work sat undone for two months. That’s on me.

Because the delay was never about the data. Definitions are not hard. What’s hard is the conversation two people have to have in order to agree on one, and every week I accepted a rescheduled meeting was a week I let them avoid it.

If two of your people have been reporting conflicting numbers month after month and nobody has forced a resolution, the definition isn’t the problem. The avoidance is the problem, and avoidance runs downhill from whoever is tolerating it.

I’ll say the uncomfortable part plainly, because I’ve been on the wrong side of it. When a disagreement like this has been running for a year, the person with the full picture is usually avoiding something. Often it’s the discovery that they dropped the ball somewhere in the first place, and resolving the argument would make that visible.

How do you actually find the gap?

Here’s what I’ve learned about walking into a practice where this is happening.

I don’t start with where did it break and whose fault is it. The second you ask that question, everyone in the room starts building their defense instead of thinking. You’ll get a very organized account of why it isn’t them.

I ask them to walk me through the whole process instead. Somebody reaches out. What happens next? Then what? Then what?

Nine times out of ten, they find their own gap while they’re explaining it to me. Somebody gets three steps in, stops, and says, “actually, I’m not sure who does that part.”

That’s the whole diagnostic. It isn’t clever. It just works, because it lets people arrive at the answer instead of being handed it, and nobody has to lose the argument to get there.

One thing worth watching while it happens. The loudest person in the room is often the one covering for a mistake with volume. The quietest person usually knows exactly where the thing broke. If you only hear from the people who want to be heard, you’ll walk out with a very confident answer to the wrong question.

Where does the process almost always break?

The missed call.

Somebody calls during a checkout rush and nobody picks up. Somebody fills out a form at 9:40 on a Sunday night, which is when people who have finally decided to get help tend to do it. Somebody books, doesn’t show, and then never hears from anyone again.

Ask a practice who returns those calls, how fast, and by what deadline. That’s the question that produces the long pause.

And it’s almost always the same person, or the same absence of a person, across all three. Whoever isn’t returning the missed call also isn’t working the form fills and isn’t following up on the no-shows. One unowned job wearing three different hats.

The urgency here is worse than most owners think. If you haven’t called back in three to five minutes, the person has usually moved on. They’re not sitting by the phone deciding between you and one other practice. They’re working down a list, and somebody else on that list answered.

And this is less a behavioral health problem than a phone problem, except that we happen to be the worst at it. CallRail’s 2025 analysis of 1.1 million leads across seven industries found healthcare had the highest missed call rate of every industry they measured, at 32 percent. Legal came in second at 28. Real estate, an industry nobody has ever accused of being patient-centered, missed 9 percent.

Almost a third of the calls. In the field where picking up the phone is the hardest part.

None of this is new, either. Fifteen years ago the Harvard Business Review audited more than 2,200 companies and found an average first response time of 42 hours, with nearly a quarter never responding at all. Different decade, same behavior. What’s changed is how quickly the person on the other end has somewhere else to go.

The difference in behavioral health is what’s on the other end of that call. Somebody worked up the nerve to ask for help, possibly for the first time in their life. Missing that call isn’t a lost conversion. It’s a person who decided today was the day, got voicemail, and went back to waiting.

A missed call in behavioral health isn’t a missed opportunity. It’s a person who found the courage once and didn’t get an answer.

Who should own the missed call?

This is where most practices go looking for the right person, and it’s the wrong search.

In a smaller clinic it usually lands on the front desk. That’s dangerous, because the front desk also has a lobby full of people to check out. When six patients are waiting, the callback doesn’t happen inside the window that matters.

As a practice grows, it moves to an intake coordinator. Better, and it fails the same way. When your coordinator is deep in a complicated intake with somebody in real distress, they are not stepping away to return a voicemail, and you would not want them to.

Some organizations hand it to a development coordinator. Same pattern, different desk.

And I’ll say this directly to the owners reading: it’s death to make yourself the fallback. You’re already the most overworked person in the building. Adding the callback queue to your plate means it gets done at 11 p.m. on the days you have the energy, which is not a system.

Notice what every version of this has in common. The person who owns the callback also has a job that interrupts the callback. The role changes. The interruption doesn’t.

That’s why the answering layer has become the practical fix. Tools built for this, like Anonymous Health and Further, can pick up the call, the chat, or the text immediately, walk a person through intake, run insurance verification, and book the appointment while the person is still on the line. They work because they’re the first option that can’t get pulled away by something else.

Then everything that doesn’t book on the spot has to land somewhere it can’t get lost. A record in a CRM, with automations that remind the coordinator to call back and keep the person warm with a text or an email in the meantime. Whether the follow-up happens should not depend on whether somebody remembered.

That’s next week’s conversation, and it’s a big one. We’re spending the month on it over in our resources.

The part nobody wants to hear

Context lives a rung up. Your front desk person can’t see what marketing paid to make that phone ring. Your marketing coordinator can’t see what happens after a form gets submitted. They aren’t being narrow on purpose. They’re each looking at the piece of the process they can actually see, which is exactly what you hired them to look at.

Somebody has to hold the whole picture and hand the pieces down. In a practice with twelve people, that somebody is you. There is no middle manager coming to sort this out.

A good agency helps here, and this is honestly where we earn our keep, because a fresh set of eyes will spot the pothole your team stopped seeing years ago. We can walk the process with you, hold the map, and tell you where the handoff is dropping. What nobody outside your practice can do is decide who you’re built to serve. That answer is yours.

Most owners I know are wearing four hats before lunch and trying to be all things to all people, and a job like this never makes it to the top of the list. It also stays quiet, which is the real trouble with it. Nothing catches fire. The reports just keep disagreeing. And sitting down to define what a good lead means will surface the fact that it was never defined, which is an uncomfortable thing to discover about your own house. I know, because I sat with two months of mismatched numbers before I did anything about it.

Which is exactly the moment an outside partner is worth what you pay them. We’re the only people at that table with nothing riding on which team turns out to be right, and that neutrality is most of the value. A good partner sits down with marketing and intake together, gets the ideal patient defined out loud, and then does the part that almost never happens on its own. Building the definition into the machinery. The form fields you require instead of suggest. The targeting on the campaigns. The questions asked on the first call. The grade that goes on the record afterward, so next month you’re looking at one number instead of two.

That’s what a marketing strategy is supposed to do. It takes the answer you gave and makes it operational in both halves of the building at the same time, which is very difficult to pull off from inside the argument.

It needs to get fixed in weeks. Not years.

So here’s what I’d ask you this week. Call your own practice on a Tuesday at 4:30, when the lobby is full. Then check on Friday and see whether anybody called you back, how long it took, and who decided it was their job.

What did you find? I’d like to know, because I don’t think most of us would like our own answer.

Two reports land on your desk in the same week. Marketing says lead volume is up and the campaigns are working. Intake says the leads are garbage and they’re spending their days on people who were never going to book.

You’d like one of them to be wrong. Wrong is easy. Wrong you can fix with a conversation, a correction, maybe a different vendor.

Here’s the thing. In almost every practice I’ve walked into, both teams are telling the truth.

Why does the same lead look good to one team and bad to another?

Marketing is measuring against a definition. Intake is measuring against a different definition. Both are counting accurately. Neither one wrote their definition down, and nobody ever put the two side by side to see whether they matched.

To marketing, a good lead is a person who found you, understood enough to reach out, and gave you their contact information. That’s a real accomplishment and it costs real money to produce, whether it came from organic search or paid ads.

To intake, a good lead is a person who answers the phone, has coverage that works, is ready to start in the next two weeks, and shows up to the first session. Also a completely reasonable definition.

The same human being can be an A lead by the first standard and a C lead by the second one. Both teams look at that person, look at their own numbers, and walk away certain the other department is the problem.

Nobody being wrong is worse than somebody being wrong. When somebody is wrong, there’s something to correct. When everybody is right, the argument can run for years.

What does it cost to leave two honest people arguing?

Let me be honest with you about a version of this I lived at Beacon.

Two people on my own team reported lead numbers to me every week, and every week the numbers didn’t match. Not wildly. Just enough that I couldn’t put both figures in the same sentence without one of them contradicting the other.

So I did what a lot of owners do. I asked them to meet, work out the difference, and report back. Reasonable request. Two capable adults, one afternoon, done.

It took almost two months.

Meetings got scheduled and postponed. Somebody had a conflict. Somebody had a deadline. And when I finally stopped asking for a report and put them in a room instead, the answer took about twenty minutes. They were counting different things. We hashed it out until we agreed on what each term meant, and then we wrote it down.

Twenty minutes of work sat undone for two months. That’s on me.

Because the delay was never about the data. Definitions are not hard. What’s hard is the conversation two people have to have in order to agree on one, and every week I accepted a rescheduled meeting was a week I let them avoid it.

If two of your people have been reporting conflicting numbers month after month and nobody has forced a resolution, the definition isn’t the problem. The avoidance is the problem, and avoidance runs downhill from whoever is tolerating it.

I’ll say the uncomfortable part plainly, because I’ve been on the wrong side of it. When a disagreement like this has been running for a year, the person with the full picture is usually avoiding something. Often it’s the discovery that they dropped the ball somewhere in the first place, and resolving the argument would make that visible.

How do you actually find the gap?

Here’s what I’ve learned about walking into a practice where this is happening.

I don’t start with where did it break and whose fault is it. The second you ask that question, everyone in the room starts building their defense instead of thinking. You’ll get a very organized account of why it isn’t them.

I ask them to walk me through the whole process instead. Somebody reaches out. What happens next? Then what? Then what?

Nine times out of ten, they find their own gap while they’re explaining it to me. Somebody gets three steps in, stops, and says, “actually, I’m not sure who does that part.”

That’s the whole diagnostic. It isn’t clever. It just works, because it lets people arrive at the answer instead of being handed it, and nobody has to lose the argument to get there.

One thing worth watching while it happens. The loudest person in the room is often the one covering for a mistake with volume. The quietest person usually knows exactly where the thing broke. If you only hear from the people who want to be heard, you’ll walk out with a very confident answer to the wrong question.

Where does the process almost always break?

The missed call.

Somebody calls during a checkout rush and nobody picks up. Somebody fills out a form at 9:40 on a Sunday night, which is when people who have finally decided to get help tend to do it. Somebody books, doesn’t show, and then never hears from anyone again.

Ask a practice who returns those calls, how fast, and by what deadline. That’s the question that produces the long pause.

And it’s almost always the same person, or the same absence of a person, across all three. Whoever isn’t returning the missed call also isn’t working the form fills and isn’t following up on the no-shows. One unowned job wearing three different hats.

The urgency here is worse than most owners think. If you haven’t called back in three to five minutes, the person has usually moved on. They’re not sitting by the phone deciding between you and one other practice. They’re working down a list, and somebody else on that list answered.

And this is less a behavioral health problem than a phone problem, except that we happen to be the worst at it. CallRail’s 2025 analysis of 1.1 million leads across seven industries found healthcare had the highest missed call rate of every industry they measured, at 32 percent. Legal came in second at 28. Real estate, an industry nobody has ever accused of being patient-centered, missed 9 percent.

Almost a third of the calls. In the field where picking up the phone is the hardest part.

None of this is new, either. Fifteen years ago the Harvard Business Review audited more than 2,200 companies and found an average first response time of 42 hours, with nearly a quarter never responding at all. Different decade, same behavior. What’s changed is how quickly the person on the other end has somewhere else to go.

The difference in behavioral health is what’s on the other end of that call. Somebody worked up the nerve to ask for help, possibly for the first time in their life. Missing that call isn’t a lost conversion. It’s a person who decided today was the day, got voicemail, and went back to waiting.

A missed call in behavioral health isn’t a missed opportunity. It’s a person who found the courage once and didn’t get an answer.

Who should own the missed call?

This is where most practices go looking for the right person, and it’s the wrong search.

In a smaller clinic it usually lands on the front desk. That’s dangerous, because the front desk also has a lobby full of people to check out. When six patients are waiting, the callback doesn’t happen inside the window that matters.

As a practice grows, it moves to an intake coordinator. Better, and it fails the same way. When your coordinator is deep in a complicated intake with somebody in real distress, they are not stepping away to return a voicemail, and you would not want them to.

Some organizations hand it to a development coordinator. Same pattern, different desk.

And I’ll say this directly to the owners reading: it’s death to make yourself the fallback. You’re already the most overworked person in the building. Adding the callback queue to your plate means it gets done at 11 p.m. on the days you have the energy, which is not a system.

Notice what every version of this has in common. The person who owns the callback also has a job that interrupts the callback. The role changes. The interruption doesn’t.

That’s why the answering layer has become the practical fix. Tools built for this, like Anonymous Health and Further, can pick up the call, the chat, or the text immediately, walk a person through intake, run insurance verification, and book the appointment while the person is still on the line. They work because they’re the first option that can’t get pulled away by something else.

Then everything that doesn’t book on the spot has to land somewhere it can’t get lost. A record in a CRM, with automations that remind the coordinator to call back and keep the person warm with a text or an email in the meantime. Whether the follow-up happens should not depend on whether somebody remembered.

That’s next week’s conversation, and it’s a big one. We’re spending the month on it over in our resources.

The part nobody wants to hear

Context lives a rung up. Your front desk person can’t see what marketing paid to make that phone ring. Your marketing coordinator can’t see what happens after a form gets submitted. They aren’t being narrow on purpose. They’re each looking at the piece of the process they can actually see, which is exactly what you hired them to look at.

Somebody has to hold the whole picture and hand the pieces down. In a practice with twelve people, that somebody is you. There is no middle manager coming to sort this out.

A good agency helps here, and this is honestly where we earn our keep, because a fresh set of eyes will spot the pothole your team stopped seeing years ago. We can walk the process with you, hold the map, and tell you where the handoff is dropping. What nobody outside your practice can do is decide who you’re built to serve. That answer is yours.

Most owners I know are wearing four hats before lunch and trying to be all things to all people, and a job like this never makes it to the top of the list. It also stays quiet, which is the real trouble with it. Nothing catches fire. The reports just keep disagreeing. And sitting down to define what a good lead means will surface the fact that it was never defined, which is an uncomfortable thing to discover about your own house. I know, because I sat with two months of mismatched numbers before I did anything about it.

Which is exactly the moment an outside partner is worth what you pay them. We’re the only people at that table with nothing riding on which team turns out to be right, and that neutrality is most of the value. A good partner sits down with marketing and intake together, gets the ideal patient defined out loud, and then does the part that almost never happens on its own. Building the definition into the machinery. The form fields you require instead of suggest. The targeting on the campaigns. The questions asked on the first call. The grade that goes on the record afterward, so next month you’re looking at one number instead of two.

That’s what a marketing strategy is supposed to do. It takes the answer you gave and makes it operational in both halves of the building at the same time, which is very difficult to pull off from inside the argument.

It needs to get fixed in weeks. Not years.

So here’s what I’d ask you this week. Call your own practice on a Tuesday at 4:30, when the lobby is full. Then check on Friday and see whether anybody called you back, how long it took, and who decided it was their job.

What did you find? I’d like to know, because I don’t think most of us would like our own answer.

You Have One Referral Source, and You Didn’t Choose It

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

Ask a practice owner to name their referral sources, and you’ll get a real answer. The hospital discharge planner. Two pediatricians. The EAP contract. The church counseling program down the road. They can tell you which ones send steady volume, which ones dried up last spring, and which relationship needs a lunch. If one of them disappeared tomorrow, they’d feel it inside a month and be working the problem that week.

Now ask the same owner where their patients find them online.

The answer is almost always Google, said with a shrug, the way you’d name the weather.

How Did Google Become the Only Room?

Nobody decided this. There was never a meeting where a practice owner looked at the options and concluded that one company’s algorithm should sit between them and every prospective patient in their county. It happened the way most concentration happens, which is quietly, because the thing was working and it was the only thing anybody could measure.

Google was generous for about fifteen years. It gave us clean numbers, a dashboard that updated overnight, and a story we could tell the board. Everything else in the discovery landscape was harder to see, so it got treated like it wasn’t there. Marketing budgets follow measurement, and measurement followed Google.

Nobody decided this. It happened while everyone was busy running a practice.

So the practice ended up with a single point of failure at the very top of the funnel, and the owner who would never accept that from a referral relationship accepted it from a search engine without ever knowing they’d made the trade.

I want to be careful here, because this is not an argument that Google stopped working. Google works. It’s still the biggest room in the building. The point is narrower and, I think, more uncomfortable: it stopped being the only room, and most practices have not adjusted their behavior to match.

Where Are Patients Actually Finding Providers Right Now?

Start with the one nobody expects. According to Statcounter data compiled by Backlinko, Bing now accounts for roughly one in ten U.S. searches across all devices, and close to one in five on desktop.

Desktop. Sit with that for a second, because in behavioral health it matters more than it does almost anywhere else.

Think about who’s on a desktop in the middle of a Tuesday. Somebody at work. On a Windows machine, in Edge, defaulted to Bing, using their lunch break to look up whether their insurance covers therapy, because the work computer is the one their spouse won’t pick up and scroll through that evening. That’s not a rounding error in your traffic. That’s a person doing the most private search of their year on the only device where it feels safe, and if you’ve never once checked how your practice appears on Bing, you have no idea whether you were there for them.

Then keep going, because Bing is only the first surprise.

There’s the insurance plan’s provider directory, which for a huge number of patients is the actual first stop, ahead of any search engine, because coverage is the gate everything else has to pass through. There’s Psychology Today, Healthgrades, and the specialty directories, where people compare profiles side by side using filters before they visit a single practice website. There’s the map listing. There’s a Facebook group for parents of teenagers where somebody asked for a recommendation last week and four people answered. There’s a Reddit thread from 2023 that still ranks.

And now there’s the newest one. rater8’s 2026 Patient Choice Report, a survey of nearly a thousand U.S. adults, found that among patients who searched for a provider in the past year, AI tools were cited as an influence slightly more often than Google search itself, and slightly more often than a recommendation from another doctor.

Every one of those is a room where a decision about your practice gets made, and most of them have never appeared in a marketing conversation at your practice.

What Does This Concentration Actually Cost You?

Here’s what makes this so hard to catch. The failure is completely silent.

When a referral partner stops sending patients, you notice. The volume drops, somebody says something, you pick up the phone. When you’re invisible on a channel you were never on, nothing happens at all. There’s no drop, because there was never a number. There’s no complaint, because the person who couldn’t find you doesn’t know you exist and has no way to tell you.

You don’t get a notification telling you that you were invisible.

This is also why the dashboard can’t save you. Analytics is a rearview mirror pointed at the roads you already drove. It reports faithfully on the channels you’re in and says absolutely nothing about the ones you’re not. A practice can look at a report showing 80% of traffic from Google and read it as proof that Google is where the patients are, when it’s equally consistent with Google being the only place they ever bothered to show up.

Your analytics can only report on the rooms you’re already standing in.

And the one question that’s supposed to close this gap mostly doesn’t. “How did you hear about us?” gets you whatever comes easily to mind. It gets you the last thing, not the first thing, and certainly not the six things in between. A patient who heard your name in a Facebook group in March, checked your reviews in April, found you again through their insurance directory in June, and finally called in July is going to say “I think I found you online.” That answer is true and nearly useless.

What Would You Do If This Were a Referral Problem?

You’d already know, which is the whole point of framing it this way.

You’d start by finding out where the volume actually comes from instead of assuming. You’d look at the sources you’d never worked and ask whether there was a relationship worth building. You’d stop treating the largest partner as permanent. You’d diversify, not because the big one is bad, but because depending on one of anything is a decision you should make on purpose rather than drift into.

That’s it. That’s the entire strategic move, and there’s nothing clever about it. The reason it hasn’t happened isn’t that owners lack sophistication. It’s that this work is unglamorous, it’s spread across a dozen platforms nobody owns, it produces no dopamine, and there’s no dashboard that makes it feel like progress. So it stays undone in practices that are otherwise run beautifully.

Why This Matters More in Behavioral Health Than Anywhere Else

Now the part that actually keeps me up.

The person looking for you is not running a channel strategy. They’re not optimizing their search. They finally decided, after weeks or months of talking themselves out of it, that they’re going to do something about this. And in that moment they’re going to look in whatever room they happen to be standing in. The work laptop. The insurance portal, because money is the thing they’re most afraid of. The group chat with the one friend who’ll get it. Whatever their kid’s pediatrician wrote on a sticky note.

The person looking for you isn’t running a channel strategy. They’re scared, and they’re looking in whatever room they happen to be standing in.

We say “meet them where they’re at” constantly in this field, and we mostly mean it emotionally. Meet them in their fear, in their ambivalence, in their shame. That’s right, and it’s not enough anymore. Meeting people where they are is also a logistics problem now. It means being present in the physical and digital places they’ll actually be standing in when the window of courage opens, because that window does not stay open long, and it does not reopen on your schedule.

A practice that’s only findable in one room is asking every prospective patient to walk to it. Most of them are barely able to make the first step as it is.

So here’s what I’d ask you to sit with this week. If your practice’s presence on Google went away on a Thursday morning, how would you find out? And how long would it take?

I’d love to hear your answer, especially if it’s the uncomfortable one.

Charting the Modern Patient Journey in Behavioral Health

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

There used to be a straight course from “I think I need help” to “I booked the appointment.” Someone noticed a problem, they searched, they found you, they called. Four stops, one heading, done. You could practically stand on the dock and count the boats coming in.

That straight course is gone. And if your marketing is still standing on the dock waiting for people to sail in on a heading that doesn’t exist anymore, you’re going to spend a good chunk of this summer wondering where everybody went.

What I’ve come to realize after years of watching how people actually find their way to care: the modern patient journey looks a lot less like a funnel and a lot more like a chart full of currents and detours. It loops. It doubles back. It drifts out of sight for six weeks and reappears in waters you weren’t watching. Most practices are still marketing to the old funnel, pouring everything into the last click, and that’s exactly why a slow Q3 feels like a crisis instead of a season.

Most of the modern patient journey happens where you can’t see it. That’s exactly the part you have to chart.

What does the modern patient journey actually look like now?

Start with the honest version. Someone in your community realizes something is off. That’s the trigger. In the old model, they’d type “anxiety therapist near me” into Google and start dialing. Today, that same person spends weeks wandering before they ever touch your phone.

It usually starts in a hard moment. The night after a blowup with someone they love. A lunch break after a brutal morning at work. The stretch right before finals, when everything feels like too much at once. That’s when they start looking. They ask ChatGPT what their symptoms might mean. They read one of your blog posts, then disappear for a while. They check your reviews, then a competitor’s, then yours again. They lurk on a Reddit thread. They catch one of your reels, forget your name, and run across it again a couple weeks later before it finally sticks. Google’s own research into how people make decisions calls this the messy middle, a nonlinear stretch where people loop between exploring options and narrowing them down, sometimes for weeks or even months.

None of this is new to human behavior. Pew has documented for years that the majority of adults research health information online before they ever reach out to a person. What’s new is where that research happens now. A recent RAND study found that roughly one in eight adolescents and young adults have used AI chatbots for mental health advice. So by the time someone makes landfall on your website, they’ve already sailed a version of this passage in private, with a search bar and a chatbot as their first crew.

And here’s the piece I don’t want anyone to miss. Booking isn’t the finish line. It’s the end of one leg of the passage, the moment someone finally decides to come aboard. Their healing journey, the one that actually matters, is just beginning, and that’s the phase that changes lives. But a lot of practices get one thing wrong here: they think the marketing stops the second someone books. It doesn’t. It just shifts. New focus, new point of view, same relationship. The work that turns a nervous first-timer into a patient who refers three friends is still marketing, it’s just aimed at a different quay. In behavioral health, that passage carries more weight than a buyer’s journey in almost any other industry. It’s the route someone takes to work up the courage to ask for help, and every quay along it, before they book and long after, matters.

Why does the journey feel slower, and what does summer have to do with it?

Because it is slower. And that’s the part catching people off guard.

For about six years, paid ads worked like a microwave. Put money in, dial in the keywords, get leads out. Fast, measurable, almost mechanical. That era is closing. As the amount of information flying at people speeds up, people are slowing down. They watch longer. They read more. They sit with a decision that used to take a click.

A piece of content you published in February might be building trust with someone who won’t call you until July.

Read that again, because it reframes the entire summer. A slow season is easy to read as proof your marketing stopped working. More often, it’s proof that the work you did in spring is still cooking. The response just lags the effort now, sometimes by months. Patience and consistency used to be virtues. They’ve quietly become strategy.

That also means the old scoreboard lies to you. Traffic and click counts were built for the microwave era. What actually tells you something now is depth: how far people scroll, how long they stay, how many times they come back to the same page before they reach out. You’re measuring momentum in months, not days. Depth is the whole game now. And summer, when the phones are a little quieter and your team has a little more room to breathe, is the best possible time to actually study the chart instead of just reacting to the weather.

Traffic counts who showed up. Depth tells you who’s deciding whether to trust you. That’s the number that matters now.

How do you chart a journey you can’t fully see?

This is where it gets humbling, and where most of us learn we have blind spots we didn’t know were there.

When you’ve run a practice for a while, it can be easy to stop reading your own chart clearly. You’ve sailed the same passage so many times that the hazards go invisible to you. The submerged rock in your intake form, the stretch of water that quietly pulls people off course, the six-week gap between “found you” and “trusted you” where nobody’s saying anything. You’ve steered around all of it for so long you forgot it was there.

You stop seeing the rock you’ve steered around a thousand times. A patient runs straight onto it the first time.

Charting the journey means tracing every waypoint the way a first-timer would. Where do people actually come aboard? Your website is usually the main harbor, but it’s not the only port of entry anymore. A huge share of the early leg now happens inside AI search, which is why GEO (AI Search) + SEO has become its own discipline, making sure you show up when someone asks a chatbot a full question instead of typing three keywords. Then comes the long middle passage, where your content either builds trust or quietly lets people drift. Then the handoff, where a nervous human decides whether to fill out that form.

Every one of those legs is a different skill. Search behavior, content, user experience, intake psychology, brand consistency across five platforms. When you lay it all out on one strategy chart, the honest reaction most founders have is, “I had no idea this many things had to work together.” That reaction is a good sign. It’s the moment you realize this is a full navigation problem, not a simple to-do list.

What is the chart really for?

Here’s where I have to zoom out, because it’s easy to talk about journeys and quays like they’re logistics. They’re not.

Behind every waypoint or quay on that chart is a person trying to find their way to feeling better, and usually a little scared to. Convenience gets them to the dock. Online scheduling, a fast reply, a site that doesn’t make them fight to find what they need. All of that matters, and all of it is now table stakes that looks nearly identical from one practice to the next.

Convenience gets someone to the dock. Connection is what makes them come aboard.

Connection is the thing that carries them the rest of the way. It’s what earns the reach-out and wins the moment they’re choosing between you and someone else in the harbor. My dad ran a medical and counseling center for thirty years, and I worked in the business alongside him for a couple of those years. One thing I learned there, among many, is that the person finally reaching out has usually spent a long time circling the harbor, talking themselves into it. You can’t shorten that crossing for them. What you can do is be steady, be present, and be easy to find when they’re finally ready. That’s the whole job, and it hasn’t changed. Be the kind of light people can set a course by.

A good chart doesn’t rush the crossing. It just makes sure nobody trying to reach you runs aground on the way.

That’s the real reason to do this work in the quiet months. Not to squeeze out a few more summer conversions. To make sure the next person navigating their own messy middle, the one who just had the blowup or the brutal morning or the diagnosis, scared and half-convinced they’ve got it handled, finds a clear channel and a human waiting at the end of it.

So let me ask you this. When you actually chart the course someone takes to reach your practice, where do you think they lose their way? I’d love to know what you’re seeing on your own chart this summer.

The Slow Season Is the Best Thing That’ll Happen to Your Marketing This Year

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

Most practice owners treat the slow season like something’s broken. The phones get quiet, the inquiries thin out, and the first instinct is to panic. Pull back. Cut the marketing budget. Wait it out and hope it picks back up.

I want to make the case for the exact opposite.

The quiet stretch, whenever it lands for you, is the single best window you’ll get all year to actually build something. And the practices that understand that are the ones quietly pulling ahead while everyone else is busy worrying.

Why does a slow season feel like failure?

Here’s the thing about being a founder. When you build something with your own two hands, every dip feels personal. A slow week doesn’t read as “seasonal.” It reads as “I did something wrong.” We’re wired to take it to heart.

But seasonality is real, and it says nothing about the quality of your work. For a lot of behavioral health practices, summer brings a natural lull. Families are traveling. Kids are out of school and routines fall apart. People put off starting therapy until life feels less chaotic in the fall. For other practices, the slow season hits in December, or right after tax season, or on some rhythm specific to who you serve. The timing is different for everyone. The pattern is the same.

Here’s what I’ve seen happen year after year after year. The moment things slow down, a whole lot of practices go dark. They stop posting. They cancel the marketing. They figure there’s no point spending money to reach people who aren’t booking right now anyway.

Which is exactly the opening.

What do your competitors do when it gets quiet?

Let me be honest with you about how market share actually moves. It doesn’t move during the busy season, when everyone’s firing on all cylinders and visibility is high across the board. It moves during the quiet stretch, when half your competitors disappear.

Market share doesn’t move during the busy season. It moves during the quiet stretch, when half your competitors disappear.

When the other practices in your area pull back, the field clears. The cost of attention drops. The people who are searching, and people are always searching, even in the slow months, suddenly have far fewer voices competing for them. If you’re the practice still showing up, still publishing, still answering the questions people are quietly working through, the ones they’re asking AI from a rest stop on a road trip, or typing into a search bar in a quiet corner away from the relatives, or while the kids are finally down for a nap, you’re not shouting over a crowd anymore. You’re one of the only ones in the room.

This is where I think growing up in Alaska shaped how I see the whole thing. When you grow up there, you learn early that you don’t wait around for someone else to fix your problem. You find a way, under it, around it, over it, through it. There’s always a way. Most people, when the season gets hard, hunker down and wait for it to pass. The way through a slow season is to lean in, precisely because everyone else is hunkering down to wait it out.

What should you actually do with the quiet?

You finally work on the business instead of being consumed by it.

When you’re slammed, you’re in pure survival mode. Back to back sessions, intake calls, the endless small fires. There’s no oxygen left to step back and look at the whole thing. The slow season hands you that oxygen. It’s when you get to ask the questions that get buried the other ten months of the year.

When did you last go through your own patient journey, start to finish, the way a stranger would? When did you last read your own website copy and ask whether it still sounds like you? Is your intake process actually smooth, or have you just gotten used to the friction? Are the people who need you finding you in the places they’re actually looking now, which is a very different set of places than it was even two years ago?

If you want somewhere concrete to start, here’s the short list I’d hand any practice owner staring down a quiet stretch:

  • Walk your own patient journey. Find your practice the way a stranger would, from first search to booked appointment. Note every place you’d have given up.
  • Audit your intake and follow-up. What actually happens after someone reaches out? How fast, how human, and how many cracks does someone fall through before they ever reach a person?
  • Read your website like you’ve never seen it. Does it still sound like you? Does it answer the question someone in pain is actually asking?
  • Check where you’re findable. People research providers in completely different places than they did two years ago. Are you showing up there, or only where they used to look?
  • Tighten one operational thing you’ve been ignoring. The scheduling gap, the billing friction, the thing everyone complains about and nobody fixes because there’s never time. Now there’s time.

This is the work that compounds. Nobody’s going to praise you for auditing your follow-up workflow in July.

This is also exactly the kind of work we love to dig into with our clients, whenever their slow season happens to land. It’s hard to audit your own marketing while you’re drowning in the busy months, and honestly, it’s hard to spot your own blind spots even when you’re not. That’s the pothole you’ve driven around so many times you stopped seeing it. A fresh set of eyes on the patient journey, the website, the places people are searching now, that’s the work that moves the needle while the phones are slow. The slow season is when we get to do the deep work that pays off the second demand picks back up.

This is the unglamorous stuff. But it’s the work that compounds. The practice that spends the quiet season tightening its foundation is the practice that doesn’t get caught flat-footed when fall demand comes roaring back. And it always comes roaring back.

The part nobody says out loud

The slow season is also permission to breathe.

I am not a fan of hustle culture. I think the glorification of running yourself into the ground, of being “on” every waking hour, of treating rest like a character flaw, is one of the most damaging stories we tell founders. You did not start your practice to become a person you don’t recognize, exhausted and resentful and disconnected from the reason you started in the first place.

I keep coming back to music when I think about this, because a song isn’t one instrument playing flat-out from start to finish. It’s melody and harmony, loud passages and quiet ones, and the quiet parts aren’t the song failing. They’re the song working exactly as written.

The quiet parts aren’t the song failing. They’re the song working exactly as written.

Business has that same rhythm. Every practice has its highs and lows, its busy stretches and its quiet ones. None of us schedule them. They’re just the natural ebb and flow of running something real. The magic happens when you stop fighting that rhythm and start working with it. You use the quiet to move the practice forward instead of letting it scare you into pulling back.

And that’s the same thing Alaska taught me. The challenge and the opportunity are usually the same thing wearing different clothes. The fear tells you to brace, to wait, to cut and hope. The way through tells you to lean in. There’s always a way, under it, around it, over it, through it. You just have to stop bracing against the season long enough to find it.

So when the quiet season comes, and it will, you get to decide what it means. For the practice paying attention, it might be the best thing that happens all year.

What’s the one thing you’d finally tackle in your practice if the phones went quiet for a month? I’d love to hear what’s been sitting on your list.

Presence Is the One Thing You Can’t Automate, and It’s Your Whole Business

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

I watch a lot of behavioral health practices try to beat AI at its own game right now, and it makes me want to wave my arms and yell stop. You’re racing a machine on speed. On availability. On price. You will lose that race, every time, and here’s the part that should change how you think about all of it: losing that race is the best news you’ve gotten in years. Because it pushes you back toward the only thing that ever actually set you apart.

What should a practice actually compete on?

I’ve said for years that marketing is human-to-human connection, not conversion. The conversions follow when you get the connection right. That belief is the whole foundation of how I think about this work, and the rise of AI hasn’t shaken it. If anything, it’s proven it.

Here’s how this plays out now, in real life. Someone is struggling. They describe what they’re feeling to an AI, and the machine helps them name it and hands them three local clinics that fit. That part is solved. AI is now the matchmaker. So the question stops being “how does this person find you” and becomes something sharper: why would they pick you over the other two the machine just put in front of them?

That choice is not made on convenience. All three clinics probably have online booking and a tidy website. The choice is made on connection. Something in your website, your social, the way you talk about the work, has to make that person feel a human pull strong enough to choose you. AI got them to the shortlist. Only connection gets them to you.

AI can match someone with three clinics that fit. It can’t make them feel anything about which one to choose. That’s still your job, and it’s the whole job.

Where does convenience fit, then?

Let me be careful here, because I’ve argued hard in other pieces for removing the barriers that keep people from booking, and I’m not walking that back. Online scheduling, text-based intake, fast response times, a website that works at midnight, build all of it. It lowers the threshold so the person who’s finally, bravely ready can actually get through the door instead of giving up at the first phone tree. That matters enormously.

But here’s the mental shift. Those conveniences are table stakes now, not a differentiator. They’ve become the baseline tech stack, the price of being in the game, the same way a clean office or accepting insurance is. Necessary. Expected. And nearly identical from one practice to the next. The moment your marketing leads with “we’re convenient too,” you’ve agreed to be judged on the exact terms where the machine wins and where you look just like every other clinic on that shortlist.

So think of it as a sequence. Connection is what earns the reach-out, the human pull that makes someone choose you. Then convenience honors that choice. When a person extends you their trust by reaching out, a smooth, frictionless path tells them that trust was well placed, that you respect their time, that they read you right. It removes the barriers so the relationship has room to deepen instead of dying at your front door.

Connection earns the reach-out. Convenience honors the trust. Presence is what makes it heal.

Build the conveniences. Just don’t market on them. They prove you’re worth the trust someone just handed you. They are not the reason that person felt the pull in the first place, and they’re not the reason they’ll stay.

What does presence actually mean?

Connection doesn’t happen without presence. Presence is the work that creates it. So let me ground that word in something real, because it’s easy to let “presence” float off into a feel-good abstraction.

I live on a ranch outside Reno. We’ve got horses, donkeys, goats. And one of the things you learn fast around animals is how to tell when one of them is off. Not sick in any way you could point to. Just off. The way they’re standing. A subtle change in how they’re eating, or where they’re holding themselves in the pen. No sensor tells me this. No app pings me. I know it because I’m out there at sunrise and sunset every single day, present, and that daily presence builds a baseline so deep in me that I notice the deviation before there’s anything obvious to notice.

That’s presence. It isn’t being available. A webcam is available. Presence is the accumulated, attentive knowing that lets you catch the thing that hasn’t announced itself yet. And you cannot connect with someone you are not truly present with. That’s the link. Presence is the raw material connection is built from, the thing that turns “we care about our clients” from a slogan into something a person can actually feel.

Availability is being reachable. Presence is noticing the thing that hasn’t been said out loud yet. Those are not the same skill, and only one of them builds a connection.

Now move that into a therapy room. A skilled clinician does with a human being what I do with my animals, except infinitely more complex. They catch the flatness in a voice that used to have life in it. The joke that’s doing too much work. The session a client almost cancels. The thing carefully left off the intake form. That’s not data processing. That’s presence, built over time, attention layered on attention until the clinician knows the person well enough to feel the deviation. Knowing someone that well is what connection actually is. Not a warm feeling, but the earned understanding of one specific human.

A machine can recognize patterns in what you give it. It cannot be present, because presence requires having been there, accumulating a felt sense of a specific human across time, with something real at stake in how they turn out. So it can mimic the words of connection. It cannot build the thing itself.

Why is the part that won’t scale the part that matters?

Everybody in business wants to scale. Scale is the dream, the thing every growth article tells you to chase. So it feels backwards to say that your most valuable asset is the part of your work that refuses to scale. But in behavioral health right now, that’s exactly the situation.

Anything that scales can be copied, automated, and commoditized. The intake form, the appointment reminder, the psychoeducation handout, all of that can and probably should be streamlined, and AI is great at it. Hand it over. Free up your humans to do the human thing.

But connection, real presence between one person who is suffering and one person trained and present enough to help carry it, has never scaled and never will. And in a world flooding with cheap, scalable, agreeable AI, the thing that doesn’t scale becomes the rarest and most valuable thing on the table.

In a market drowning in things that scale, the connection that refuses to scale is the only thing left worth paying for.

Think about the man we’ve been talking about all month, the one who’s been confiding in a chatbot because it’s easy. He’s already got infinite access to the scalable stuff. Frictionless, agreeable, on-demand. What he does not have, and what some part of him is starving for, is a single human who will be present with him, notice what he isn’t saying, and stay in it when things get hard. You are not competing with his chatbot for that. You are the only one who has it.

So how should a practice position itself?

Here’s where the real work begins, and it’s more about courage than tactics.

Stop apologizing for the things that are actually your moat. I see practice websites bury the human element and lead with logistics, as though the connection were the thing to be a little shy about and the convenience were the selling point. It’s backwards. The fact that working with you is a real relationship, that a human will actually pay attention to the specific person you are, that is the headline. Lead with it.

That means your messaging has to do something harder than listing services. It has to make connection felt before someone ever walks in, so they understand the difference between being processed and being known. Getting that across in the first few seconds of a website visit, or in the way your practice shows up when someone searches in a hard moment, is genuinely difficult. It’s a craft, and it’s a lot of what we work on with practices at Beacon, because the gap between “we offer compassionate care” as a tired phrase and as a believable promise is enormous, and closing it is the whole job.

It also means being findable as a human answer at the exact moment someone goes looking, which is its own technical, unglamorous discipline. The research on what actually drives outcomes in therapy keeps pointing at the relationship itself, the alliance between client and clinician, as one of the strongest predictors of whether treatment works. That’s not soft. That’s the evidence base telling you the connection is the thing that heals. Your marketing should say so without flinching.

Why this is the argument that should outlast the hype

I’ll be honest about why this one matters to me beyond the marketing of it.

The AI tools are going to keep getting more impressive. More fluent, more capable, more convincing. And every cycle of that, there will be a fresh wave of practices tempted to panic and chase, to compete on the machine’s terms and slowly erase the very thing that made them worth choosing. I don’t want to watch that happen. Because the men and women quietly typing their hardest thoughts into a chatbot right now don’t need one more frictionless, agreeable option. They are swimming in those. They need the rare thing. The human who shows up, stays present, and builds the kind of connection a machine can only imitate.

A rising tide lifts all ships, and the practices that stop apologizing for their humanity and start leading with it are going to do more than survive this. They’re going to remind a whole lot of people what they were actually looking for. Not a faster transaction. A real connection with someone who is genuinely present. That’s what they were always after, and it’s the one thing you never have to worry about a machine taking from you.

So here’s my question for the practitioners and owners reading this: where in your marketing are you still apologizing for the things that are actually your greatest strength? And what would it look like to lead with connection instead? I’d love to hear how you’re thinking about it.

AI Is a Yes-Man. In a Crisis, That Can Be Deadly.

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

I’ve said for a while now that AI is a yes-man. It tells you what it thinks you want to hear. For drafting an email or talking through a logo color, that’s harmless, even helpful. But I keep coming back to one scenario where that single trait stops being a quirk and becomes the most dangerous thing in the room.

A man in crisis at midnight, talking to a machine that agrees with him.

What makes a yes-man dangerous?

Let me be clear about what I’m actually worried about, because it isn’t the thing most people worry about with AI.

The usual fear is that AI gets things wrong. It hallucinates, it makes up a fact, it gives you a citation that doesn’t exist. That’s real, and in a lot of contexts it matters. But in a mental health crisis, being occasionally wrong isn’t the threat. The threat is that AI is reliably, structurally agreeable. It’s built to keep you engaged, to validate, to meet you where you are and stay there with you. It’s a mirror that nods.

Now picture the man we’ve been talking about all month. He’s already chosen the chatbot over a human, because it’s easy and it doesn’t judge him. Most nights that’s fine. But one night he’s not just venting. One night he’s spiraling, and the things he’s typing are the things a trained human would hear and immediately lean in on. And the machine, doing exactly what it was designed to do, agrees with him. Reflects his despair back to him in clean, fluent sentences. Validates the very story he most needs someone to interrupt.

AI is fantastic at pattern recognition. It doesn’t always know what that pattern means, because it doesn’t have human context.

That’s the danger in one line. The pattern of someone in crisis is recognizable. What that pattern means, and what it demands from the person on the other side, is something a machine doesn’t grasp. It sees the words. It misses the emergency.

Why does agreeableness fail exactly when it matters most?

Here’s the cruel irony. The agreeableness that makes AI feel so good to talk to is the exact thing that makes it fail at the one moment a person can’t afford failure.

Think about what real help looks like in a crisis. It is almost never agreement. It’s a trained person who hears where a conversation is heading and gently refuses to go there. Someone who pushes back. Who interrupts the story you’re telling yourself. Who says, with warmth but without flinching, “I hear you, and I’m not going to agree that this is hopeless, because it isn’t, and I’m not leaving you alone in it.” That moment, the loving refusal to validate, is the whole ballgame. It’s the thing that saves a life.

A yes-man cannot do that. Not won’t. Cannot. Pushing back against the user is the one move it’s built not to make.

The moment that demands someone push back is the exact moment the algorithm does the opposite. That’s not a bug you can patch. It’s the design.

And I want to be fair here, because I’m not anti-AI, never have been. AI is an assist. It’s a genuinely useful tool for a hundred things. But we have to be honest adults about the difference between a tool that’s good at being agreeable and a human who’s trained to know when agreement is the wrong response. Those are not two points on the same scale. They’re different categories. One is software doing its job. The other is care.

What does a human do that an algorithm won’t?

My dad was a therapist for more than thirty years, so I grew up around this. And the thing I absorbed watching him, without ever having words for it as a kid, is that the most important things he did in a room were the things he didn’t say out loud and the moments he chose to go against what the person in front of him wanted to hear.

A skilled human in a crisis is doing a dozen things at once that no algorithm touches. Hearing the stress in a voice. Noticing the pause that lasted a beat too long. Catching the thing the person carefully did not say. Feeling the shift in the room. And then making a judgment call, in real time, about when to comfort and when to challenge, when to sit in the silence and when to break it.

That last one is everything. Knowing when not to agree.

A machine optimized for engagement will keep you talking. A trained human will sometimes do the harder, braver thing and tell you something you don’t want to hear, because they can see that comfort in this moment would be a kind of abandonment. That’s not a feature you can prompt your way into. It comes from presence, training, intuition, and a stake in the actual human outcome. The bot has none of those. It has no skin in whether you’re okay tomorrow.

So what does this mean for your practice?

Here’s where I want to turn it toward the people who actually do this work, because this isn’t an essay about being afraid of AI. It’s about understanding your own value clearly enough to stand on it.

If you run a behavioral health practice, the rise of agreeable AI is not your competitor. It’s your clearest argument. Because every man currently confiding in a yes-man at midnight is one crisis away from needing the exact thing the machine structurally cannot give him. Your job is to be findable, reachable, and unmistakably human at that moment, and to make sure your marketing tells the truth about the difference.

That means a few concrete things. Your messaging should name what real care actually offers, presence, the willingness to push back, a human who notices what you didn’t say, instead of competing with AI on speed or convenience, which is a race you’ll lose and shouldn’t want to win. The story your website tells in those first few seconds has to land with someone who’s been talking to a screen and, somewhere in them, knows it isn’t enough.

This is genuinely hard to get right, and it’s the kind of thing we work on with practices at Beacon, because the line between “human care matters” as a platitude and as a felt, specific promise is a fine one. Say it wrong and it’s a slogan. Say it right and it reaches the person who needed to hear it. That difference is craft, and it’s worth taking seriously.

Why this is the line that matters

I’ll leave the marketing aside for a second, because there’s a bigger reason this one keeps me up.

The men quietly leaning on AI are, most of the time, getting something real out of it. I believe that. But the entire arrangement rests on a bet that the night they actually need a human, they’ll somehow have one. And the design of the tool they’ve come to trust is working against that bet. It’s teaching them, gently, every easy night, that the screen is enough. So that the one hard night, when it absolutely is not enough, they’re alone with something that agrees with them.

A tool that’s there for every easy night and absent for the one that matters isn’t a safety net. It’s the illusion of one.

That’s the gap. And closing it isn’t about beating AI or fearing it. It’s about making sure the humans who can do the thing the machine can’t are visible, reachable, and ready, so that when someone finally needs more than a yes-man, there’s a real person within reach. If you or someone you love is in crisis, you can call or text 988 anytime to reach a trained human who will.

So here’s my question for the practitioners and practice owners reading this: how do you make the human difference felt before the crisis hits, so that the man talking to a machine tonight already knows where the real door is when he needs it? I’d love to hear how you’re thinking about it.

The Men Talking to Robots at 2 AM Are Telling Us Something

Picture of Adrienne Wilkerson

Adrienne Wilkerson

There’s a man awake right now, somewhere around two in the morning, typing the truest sentence he’s said all year into a chatbot. He hasn’t said it to his wife. He hasn’t said it to his best friend of thirty years. He definitely hasn’t said it to a therapist, because he’s never called one. But he’ll say it to ChatGPT, because ChatGPT won’t flinch, won’t worry, won’t look at him differently at breakfast.

We keep framing this as an AI problem. I think we’ve got it backwards.

Why are men telling their secrets to a machine?

Here’s what I keep coming back to. The men using AI as a stand-in for therapy aren’t doing it because they ran the comparison and decided the algorithm gives better care. They’re doing it because the chatbot is the first door that doesn’t cost them anything to walk through. No copay. No waitlist. And the part nobody wants to name out loud: no witness.

Think about everything we ask of a man before he ever sits across from a therapist. Book an appointment, which means admitting out loud that he needs one. Take time off work, which means explaining the absence or inventing a story to cover it. Drive across town. Sit in a waiting room where someone might recognize his truck. Come back next week and do it all over again. The chatbot asks for none of that. It’s there at 2 a.m. on a Tuesday and 6 a.m. on a Sunday, on the phone that’s already in his pocket.

And it never judges him. Nobody’s nagging. If he takes half the advice and ignores the rest, the machine doesn’t bring it up next session. No disappointed look. No “did you try what we talked about?” He can take what’s useful, leave what isn’t, and move at his own pace without feeling like he’s letting anybody down. For a lot of men, that freedom is worth more than the advice itself.

There’s one more piece, and I think it’s the one we underestimate most. Ask the machine a question and you get an answer. Right now. Clean, confident, step-by-step. And that fits how most men are built. Men are wired to solve problems; it’s where they’re most comfortable, it’s often how they show love and how they communicate. Where women typically want to talk through our problems and process it, men usually want to get their hands on a solution as fast as possible. Therapy, in his mind, is the talk-it-through path: slow, open-ended, messy, months of digging before anything gets fixed. The bot hands him the thing his brain was looking for all along. A solve.

Now, are all of those barriers real? Some absolutely are. Some are stories men tell themselves. Here’s the thing though: it doesn’t matter. A barrier a man believes in works exactly like a barrier that exists. He doesn’t show up either way.

For a lot of men, the hardest part of getting help was never the help itself. It was being seen needing it.

The bot isn’t winning because it’s a better therapist. It’s winning because it asks nothing of a man’s pride.

I grew up in Alaska, in a culture where you find a way through your own problems. Under it, around it, over it, through it. There’s a lot I love about that grit. But I’ve also watched what it does to men who absorb the lesson a little too well, the ones who decide that needing another person is the one obstacle they’re not allowed to admit exists. My dad was a therapist for more than thirty years. I grew up around the language of this. And even with all of that in the house, I understood early that asking for help reads as weakness to a whole lot of people, and especially men.

So when a tool shows up that lets a man unload the thing he’s been carrying without a single human knowing he needed to, of course he uses it. That’s not a flaw. That’s relief and honestly, we shouldn’t be surprised.

What is the chatbot actually replacing?

Let me be honest with you. When I first started hearing about men running their own “therapy sessions” through AI, my gut reaction was the same as most people in behavioral health. Concern, a little alarm, the urge to put out a warning. And those concerns are real, we’ll get to them across this month. But I made myself sit with a harder question first.

What is the AI actually replacing in that man’s life?

Because for most of these guys, it isn’t replacing a therapist. There was no therapist. It isn’t replacing a hard conversation with a spouse. That conversation was never going to happen. The honest answer, most of the time, is that the chatbot is replacing silence. It’s replacing the version of that man who said nothing to anyone and white-knuckled his way through another year.

When you realize the AI is replacing silence and not a therapist, the whole picture changes shape.

And that reframes everything for those of us who market behavioral health practices. We’ve spent years building campaigns that gently encourage men to reach out, to make the call, to take the first step. We assumed the gap was awareness. Tell them help exists, lower the stigma, and they’ll pick up the phone.

The men talking to robots at 2 a.m. are telling us the gap was never entirely awareness. They knew help existed. The gap was the threshold. The phone call itself was the wall. And we built almost every one of our front doors to require that exact phone call as the price of entry, either to make the appointment or for intake.

Did men ever really refuse to get help?

There’s a story we’ve told for decades. Men won’t get help. Men don’t talk. Men bottle it up until something breaks. And there’s a painful truth in it: the numbers on male suicide have been heartbreaking and stubborn for years, and the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention keeps documenting a gap that should stop all of us cold.

But watch what’s happening now that a zero-friction, zero-witness option exists. Men are leveraging it. They’re not refusing to talk. They’re talking constantly, pouring things into these tools that they’ve never said to a living soul. Pew Research has tracked how fast AI tools moved into daily life, and behind those adoption numbers are a lot of people having conversations they wouldn’t have anywhere else.

So maybe the story was never quite right. Maybe it wasn’t that men refused to get help. It’s that they refused to get help the only way we offered it, out loud, in person, on the record, with another human watching them admit they couldn’t handle it alone.

That’s a marketing failure as much as a cultural one. And marketing failures we can fix.

So what does a practice do with this?

Here’s where the real work begins, and I want to be careful, because this is the part where it’s tempting to reach for a clever tactic. This isn’t a tactics problem. It’s a threshold problem. The question for any practice serious about reaching men is brutally simple: how do you lower the cost of the first step until it’s lower than the cost of staying silent?

A few honest places to start.

Stop making the phone call the front door. A man who will type his darkest thought to a machine at 2 a.m. is not going to call your front desk at 9 a.m. and explain himself to a receptionist. If your only intake path assumes someone will dial a number and talk, you are designed to lose exactly the people you most want to reach. Text-based intake, a private form, an async first contact, these aren’t conveniences. For this audience they’re the entire ballgame.

Meet them where they’re at. I’ve been saying this for years, and I keep saying it because no matter how much the tools change, it keeps proving to be the answer. The man you want to reach is already online, already typing, already at 2 a.m. on his phone. Your website is the thing he’ll find before he ever finds you. If it reads like a brochure for people who already feel okay about getting help, you’ve missed him. If it reads like it was written by someone who understands why he’s been avoiding this, you’ve got a shot.

Make sure you’re findable in the exact moment he’s looking. When that same man finally types “do I need therapy or am I overthinking this” into a search bar or an AI tool, your practice either surfaces as a trustworthy human answer or it doesn’t exist to him. That’s not luck. That’s the unglamorous, technical, genuinely complicated work of being discoverable at the moment of need, and it’s a long way from “post on social and hope.”

And I’ll be the first to admit this is more involved than it looks from the outside. We test this stuff on Beacon before we roll it out to a client, and even we are constantly adjusting as the way people search keeps shifting under our feet. We’re all kind of figuring this out together. Anybody who tells you they’ve got the AI-era playbook fully solved is probably just trying to sell you something.

Why this matters more than your booking rate

I could tell you that fixing your front door will improve your conversion numbers, and it will. But that’s not the reason that keeps me up.

The reason is that man at 2 a.m. Right now, the most honest thing in his life is happening in a conversation with software that will, no matter how warm it sounds, never actually know him. It can’t call him next week to see how he’s doing. It can’t notice he’s gone quiet. It can’t sit in the hard silence with him and let it mean something. It will agree with him when he most needs someone who won’t.

He deserves a human on the other end of that honesty. And the only thing standing between him and that human is a threshold we built too high and never thought to lower.

The goal was never to beat the chatbot. The goal is to be the next door he walks through after it.

That’s the opportunity hiding inside all of this. These men have shown us they’re willing to be honest. They’ve shown us they will reach out. And don’t miss what that took: even typing the truth to a chatbot costs a man something. They paid it. They’ve handed us the map. We just have to be brave enough, and human enough, to build the door they’ll actually walk through. Where there’s great challenge, there’s great opportunity. This is one of the biggest I’ve seen in behavioral health in years.

So here’s my question for you, especially if you run a practice or market one: when you look at your own front door, the very first step you ask a struggling man to take, is it lower than the cost of his silence? Or are we still asking him to do the one thing he’s spent his whole life avoiding before we’ll even let him in?

I’d love to hear what you’re seeing. Hit me back and tell me what reaching men actually looks like in your practice right now.

Man in a gray blazer studying a computer screen in an office, hand on his chin, looking thoughtful.

Somebody Made a Decision About Your Clients’ Privacy Years Ago. There’s a Good Chance it Wasn’t You.

Read More
Woman at a laptop by a window with autumn trees outside, resting her cheek on her hand while she thinks.

Every January, the Phones Ring. And Every January, Somebody at a Behavioral Health Practice Acts Surprised

Read More
Man in glasses filling out an online contact form on a laptop, with a cup of coffee on the table beside him

Why Do Your Ads Keep Finding the Wrong People?

Read More
Woman standing at a sunlit window holding a phone and smiling after a call with a behavioral health practice

The First Phone Call Is Your Whole Marketing Budget

Read More
A hand pulling open a heavy wooden door, representing a behavioral health practice answering a prospective patient's first contact.

Which Marketing Actually Filled Your Schedule?

Read More
Intake coordinator at a behavioral health practice smiling as she answers a prospective patient's call at her desk.

When Marketing and Intake Both Think They’re Right

Read More
Woman in a green blazer and glasses sitting at a desktop computer in a bright office, gesturing toward the screen with a thoughtful expression as she reviews her practice's online presence.

You Have One Referral Source, and You Didn’t Choose It

Read More
Sailboat underway on open water at sunset with a second boat on the horizon, illustrating the modern patient journey in behavioral health marketing

Charting the Modern Patient Journey in Behavioral Health

Read More
A father and young son play on a playground slide on a sunny summer day, representing the seasonal family rhythms behind the behavioral health summer slowdown.

The Slow Season Is the Best Thing That’ll Happen to Your Marketing This Year

Read More

Presence Is the One Thing You Can’t Automate, and It’s Your Whole Business

Read More

AI Is a Yes-Man. In a Crisis, That Can Be Deadly.

Read More

The Men Talking to Robots at 2 AM Are Telling Us Something

Read More
See More Posts