See Our Blogs

October makes “ghosting” an easy joke, but there’s a version of it happening inside practices all year long. Someone fills out a form, leaves a voicemail, or asks for an appointment, and then waits. Maybe they hear back later that afternoon. Maybe the next morning. Sometimes they never hear back at all. 

That gap between inquiry and response is part of your marketing, whether your marketing team owns it or not. 

You can spend months improving paid campaigns, SEO, social content, and your website, only to lose the person once they finally raise their hand. That’s why response time, follow-up ownership, and second and third contact attempts belong in the same conversation as cost per lead and conversion rate. 

The easiest place to start is surprisingly simple: submit a lead to your own practice and see what happens. 

Contact Beacon Media + Marketing to see where your follow-up process may be slowing down or losing people. 

How Fast Should Your Practice Respond to a New Lead? 

For Beacon, the working target is three minutes, with five minutes as the outside edge for a new inquiry during covered hours. That’s an operational benchmark we use in behavioral health marketing, not a clinical standard or federal requirement. The important part is that your practice chooses a response window, writes it down, and measures whether the team is actually meeting it. 

That doesn’t mean a person disappears at minute six. It does mean a new inquiry should be treated like something happening now, especially when the person may be contacting several practices at once. 

The broader access data gives us a pretty good reason to take that seriously. A 2024 JAMA secret-shopper study called 320 psychiatric clinician offices listed as accepting Medicaid across New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Phoenix. Only 27.2% of the calls resulted in an available appointment with any clinician at the practice. Among clinicians where an appointment couldn’t be made, 35% didn’t answer on either of two attempts, while another 15.2% had an incorrect or out-of-service phone number.  

The study was looking at access rather than marketing, but the experience is the same for the person trying to reach the practice. They made the call, and nobody answered. 

 That’s the part marketing can’t afford to ignore. A lead only has value if your intake process is ready to pick it up and move it forward. 

Who Actually Owns the Follow-Up? 

Lead follow-up works better when one named person owns it, there’s a defined response window, and somebody else is clearly responsible when that person is unavailable. “The intake team handles it” may sound like ownership, but it still leaves room for everyone to assume somebody else is taking care of the next call or form. 

This gets especially messy in practices where intake responsibilities are spread across several roles. 

The front desk answers calls when they can. An intake coordinator works web forms between longer conversations. The practice owner steps in when something has been sitting too long. Everyone is helping, yet nobody can answer a basic question without checking first: Who owns the lead that came in at 10:17 this morning? 

We’ve written before about why lead follow-up should have a named owner. That owner doesn’t have to personally handle every inquiry forever. They do, however, need to know when a new lead has arrived, what the response standard is, and when responsibility has moved to someone else. 

A backup matters just as much. PTO, lunch breaks, meetings, and complicated intake calls are normal. A follow-up system that works only when one particular employee is sitting at their desk isn’t much of a system. 

This is where a CRM becomes useful for more than marketing reports. A lead record should show who owns the inquiry, when it came in, when the first attempt happened, and what needs to happen next. Without that visibility, a lead can quietly sit in an inbox while everyone assumes someone else called. 

What Should a Second or Third Contact Attempt Actually Look Like? 

A second attempt should be a real continuation of the first one, not the exact same voicemail repeated the next afternoon. The person may have missed your first call because they were working, caring for a child, in another appointment, or simply weren’t ready to answer an unfamiliar number. That gives you room to make follow-up easier for them. 

If the first attempt was a phone call, the next one may be another call at a different time of day, followed by a permitted text or email if your process allows it. The message can be brief: who you are, why you’re reaching out, and the easiest way to reconnect. 

A third attempt can acknowledge that you haven’t connected yet and make the next step clear without putting pressure on the person. The goal is consistency, not chasing someone indefinitely. 

What matters is that the sequence has already been decided. Intake shouldn’t have to improvise a follow-up cadence for every new inquiry. 

That also means defining what counts as an attempt. A call that rings once and gets disconnected shouldn’t quietly become “attempt one” in the CRM. Neither should sending a message to an address that bounced back. 

Your team should agree on a few basic things: 

• How quickly does the first attempt happen?  

• How long do you wait before trying again?  

• Which channels can you use?  

• How many attempts are made before the lead changes status?  

• Who owns each attempt?  

Those rules become even more important when the practice starts grading leads. A person who never answered one phone call and a person who received three documented attempts across two channels shouldn’t automatically land in the same “unresponsive” bucket. 

That’s one reason a shared definition of a qualified lead needs intake data behind it. Reachability is part of the story, but only when the practice has actually made a reasonable effort to reach the person. 

“No response” only tells you something when you know what your team did before assigning that outcome. 

How Do You Know Whether Your Front Door Is Actually Working? 

Test it yourself. Submit a routine inquiry through the same path a prospective patient would use, then document exactly what happens next. You’re looking at the experience from the outside, where nobody knows your internal process or who was supposed to respond. 

There’s good precedent for this kind of audit. 

CMS’s 2024 Medicaid and CHIP managed care final rule requires states to use an independent entity to conduct annual secret-shopper surveys to check appointment wait times and provider-directory accuracy. The same rule established a maximum appointment wait-time standard of 10 business days for routine outpatient mental health and substance use disorder services in Medicaid managed care. 

A 2025 study published in The American Journal of Managed Care used secret-shopper calls to examine mental health counselor listings in Pennsylvania’s ACA Marketplace. Researchers examined 8,306 regulatory listings. Among the 2,152 provider listings they were able to fully verify through calls, 65.2% had at least one inaccuracy, with an incorrect phone number the most common problem at 56.6%. Appointments were available with only 14.9% of those providers, with an average wait of 33.2 days. 

Your internal audit can be much simpler, but the idea is the same: stop evaluating the process from the system side and experience it the way a new person does. 

Run a 15-Minute Secret-Shop Test 

Pick a normal business day rather than warning the intake team that you’re testing them. 

1. Submit the website form. Use a test email and phone number that your team won’t immediately recognize.  

2. Start a timer. Record when the confirmation page or automated message appears and when the first human response arrives.  

3. Don’t answer the first call. This lets you see what your second contact attempt actually looks like.  

4. Track the next 24–48 hours. Note each call, voicemail, text, or email and whether the messages make it clear what you should do next.  

5. Check the record afterward. Ask the team to show you where the lead lives, who owned it, and how each attempt was documented.  

Do the same thing with a phone call if calls are an important conversion path for your practice. Try it during a busy period, during lunch, and near the end of the day. You may get very different results. 

Your website is often where that first inquiry happens, so testing the form, confirmation message, and handoff into intake should be part of the audit. This isn’t about catching an employee doing something wrong. You’re looking for places where the system makes good follow-through harder than it needs to be. 

What Should You Look for During the Audit? 

Start with response time, but don’t stop there. A quick callback doesn’t help much if the person sounds rushed, has no idea why you’re calling, or can’t answer basic questions about the next step. 

Pay attention to how the process feels. 

Did the form give you confirmation that it went through? Did the caller identify the practice clearly? Was the voicemail understandable? If you missed the first call, did anyone try again? Could you tell how to call back without searching for the number? If a handoff happened between two employees, did you have to repeat everything? 

Those little points of friction are easy to overlook from inside the practice because your team already knows how everything works. 

There’s also a bigger access issue here. In the 2024 JAMA audit, researchers made two attempts to reach clinicians when necessary, and 35% of clinicians without an available appointment still didn’t answer either call. The 2025 Pennsylvania study found access problems on an even larger scale, including inaccurate contact information and very limited appointment availability. 

Your practice may have great clinicians and plenty of availability. A prospective patient can only experience those things after they successfully get through intake. 

If the test uncovers a problem, repeat it after making changes. That’s how you find out whether the fix actually changed the experience. 

What Happens When Follow-Up Isn’t Being Tracked? 

You lose the ability to tell the difference between a marketing problem and an intake problem. A campaign can generate the right inquiries while the final report makes those leads look unqualified simply because nobody knows what happened after they came in. This is one of the most frustrating gaps for marketing teams. 

Imagine 40 people submit forms from a paid campaign. At the end of the month, intake says only 12 turned into appointments. On the surface, it looks like a lead-quality problem. Then you look closer. Eight leads weren’t called until the following day. Five received one voicemail and no second attempt. Three have no follow-up activity recorded at all. Suddenly the campaign looks different. 

That doesn’t automatically mean those people would have scheduled with faster or more persistent follow-up. It means you don’t have enough information to blame lead quality. This is why marketing and intake need to review lead quality together rather than comparing two disconnected reports at the end of the month. 

Response time should be one of the fields they review. So should number of attempts and final outcome. Once those are visible, you can ask much better questions. Are web forms getting slower responses than calls? Do leads that arrive after 4 p.m. receive fewer attempts? Is one team member consistently converting more inquiries because of how they handle the conversation? The answers give you something concrete to improve. 

How Should You Set a Follow-Up Standard Your Team Can Actually Use? 

Start with the process you can realistically staff and measure. Write down the first-response target, the number of follow-up attempts, the channels your team can use, and the person who owns each stage. Then put those expectations somewhere the whole intake team can see them. 

If three to five minutes isn’t realistic with your current staffing, set a response time your team can actually stick to and start measuring from there. Maybe that means aiming for 10 minutes during business hours at first. Track it for a month, then look at where the delays are happening. If most leads are getting a quick response but a handful are sitting for hours, those are the ones worth digging into. 

You can spend months improving your paid advertising and still lose the lead if nobody follows up once they reach out. 

You’ll also want to decide what happens outside normal coverage. An inquiry that comes in at 8:30 p.m. probably shouldn’t be measured against the same workflow as one that arrives at 10 a.m. unless you’ve intentionally staffed for that. 

The standard should answer four questions without debate: Who responds? How fast? What happens if they don’t connect? Where is that recorded? 

Once those answers are clear, follow-up becomes much easier to audit and improve. A response-time standard only works when somebody owns it and the practice can see whether it was met. 

Why Doesn’t Faster Follow-Up Solve Everything? 

Faster follow-up can improve the intake experience, but it won’t solve every reason a lead fails to schedule. Someone may have insurance your practice doesn’t accept, need a service you don’t provide, live outside your service area, decide they aren’t ready, or find that your next available appointment doesn’t work for them. 

That context matters when you look at your results. A lead that didn’t schedule after three documented contact attempts tells you something different from one that sat unanswered for several hours and received a single voicemail. 

The same goes for your secret-shop test. It can show you whether your form works, how quickly someone responds, whether follow-up happens, and what the experience feels like from the outside. It can’t tell you whether every inquiry should become a patient. 

That’s why response time should sit alongside lead quality, availability, payer fit, and final outcome when you review intake performance. 

What Happens After Someone Raises Their Hand? 

Once someone reaches out, your marketing has already done a big part of its job. The next question is whether your intake process gives that person a clear path forward. 

Take one inquiry this week and follow it all the way through. Look at when it came in, how quickly someone responded, what happened after the first missed connection, who owned each follow-up attempt, and how the final outcome was recorded. 

Then run the same process yourself. Submit the form. Miss the first call. See what happens next. 

You may find that everything works exactly the way your team expects. Or you may uncover something small, like a form going to the wrong inbox, a voicemail that isn’t checked often enough, or a lead being marked unresponsive after one attempt. 

Those are the kinds of gaps that are much easier to fix once you can actually see them. 

If you want a clearer picture of what happens after your marketing generates a lead, talk with Beacon about connecting your campaigns, CRM, and intake process. 

Frequently Asked Questions 

How many times should a practice follow up with a new lead? 

There isn’t one universal number that fits every practice. The important part is having a documented sequence instead of leaving follow-up to individual judgment. Decide how many attempts your team will make, which channels are appropriate, how far apart the attempts should be, and when the lead receives a final status. 

Does a voicemail count as a follow-up attempt? 

Yes, if the call genuinely reached voicemail and the team left an appropriate message. The CRM should document when the attempt happened and what channel was used. Your practice should also distinguish a completed attempt from a wrong number, disconnected call, bounced email, or other failed contact method. 

Who should be responsible for returning new inquiries? 

One named role or person should own the initial response, with a clearly identified backup when that person is unavailable. Shared responsibility without defined ownership makes it harder to know who is handling a new inquiry and much easier for leads to sit unanswered. 

Should web forms be handled as quickly as phone calls? 

Yes, if both represent new-patient inquiries. A person who fills out a form has already taken the step of contacting the practice, so the form shouldn’t automatically drop into an inbox that gets reviewed hours later. Your response-time standard should account for every channel where new leads arrive. 

How often should a practice test its own intake process? 

A simple secret-shop test can be useful whenever the practice changes forms, phone systems, staffing, CRM workflows, or intake procedures. It’s also worth testing periodically even when nothing has changed, since small breakdowns in routing, ownership, and follow-up can go unnoticed internally.