Skip to content
In most cases yes, because the two systems cover different periods in a person’s relationship with the practice. An electronic health record manages care for people who are already patients. A CRM manages the period before that, when a person is an inquiry who has not yet booked, and that window is where marketing performance is either measured or lost.
What does an EHR actually track?
Clinical and administrative information for established patients. Scheduling, documentation, treatment plans, billing, and claims.
An EHR record generally begins when a person becomes a patient. That timing is the issue, because by then the marketing questions have already been answered and usually not recorded. Which campaign produced the inquiry, how long the callback took, how many attempts were made, and what happened to the people who never became patients are all events that occurred before the EHR record existed.
What does a CRM track that an EHR does not?
The inquiry stage, and the people who never converted.
That includes the source of the contact, the timestamp of first contact, every follow-up attempt and its outcome, a quality grade applied after the first conversation, and a final disposition for people who did not begin care.
The last of those is the one practices most often miss. An EHR contains no record of the person who called, could not be reached, and went elsewhere. For marketing purposes, that person is frequently the most informative record in the system.
Can an EHR be used for both?
Some can hold a pre-patient record, and practices do work this way. The limitations tend to appear at reporting time.
Reporting built for clinical and billing workflows rarely answers marketing questions. Campaign-level fields often do not exist. Records for people who never became patients may not be retained, or may be structured in a way that makes them difficult to analyze as a group.
The functional test is simple. Ask whether the current system can produce a list of every inquiry from last month, with its source, grade, and outcome. A system that can do that is sufficient. A system that cannot is the reason the marketing question stays unanswered.
What about smaller practices?
The question is less about size than about volume and complexity. A practice receiving a handful of inquiries a month, with one person handling all of them, may track this adequately in a shared spreadsheet.
The threshold is usually crossed when more than one person touches an inquiry, or when enough inquiries arrive that some are forgotten. At that point, the failure mode is not poor record keeping. It is that leads disappear entirely.
What should a practice look for?
A required source field, a required disposition field, and automated follow-up reminders. Those three features address the majority of what goes wrong at the inquiry stage.
Beacon works with behavioral health organizations on connecting marketing activity to client outcomes.
